An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
U.S. Agency for International Development
Audit of the Fund Accountability Statement of Macedonian Civic Education Center, Youth Ethnic Integration Project in North Macedonia, Cooperative Agreement AID-165-A-17-00001, January 1 to December 31, 2020
Audit of the Fund Accountability Statement of the Local Currency Trust Fund Managed by USAID/Kosovo, for Fiscal Years Ending September 30, 2019, and September 30, 2020
Financial Audit of USAID Resources Managed by Lilongwe Diocese Catholic Health Commission in Malawi Under Cooperative Agreement 72061219CA00005, October 1, 2019, to September 30, 2020
The Fiscal Year 2022 Oversight Plan reflects the priority work that the OIG believes is necessary to keep the EPA, the CSB, and Congress fully informed about issues relating to the administration of Agency programs and operations. It is also important to note that our planning efforts are not static and that the projects included herein may be modified throughout the year as challenges and risks for the EPA and the CSB evolve and emerge.When originally issued on December 14, 2021, this document counted Audit of EPA’s Integrated Risk Information System Configuration-Management and Access-Control Compliance as an ongoing rather than a planned project. We updated the document on December 16, 2021, to accurately reflect the status of the project. This correction changed the number of planned projects for the EPA to 43 and ongoing projects for the EPA to 24.
For our final report on the evaluation of the Nationwide Public Safety Broadband Network's (NPSBN's) security architecture, our objective was to assess the NPSBN's security risks resulting from its security architecture. We contracted with The MITRE Corporation (MITRE)—an independent firm—to perform this evaluation. Our office oversaw the progress of this evaluation to ensure that MITRE performed the evaluation in accordance with the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency’s Quality Standards for Inspection and Evaluation (January 2012) and contract terms. However, MITRE is solely responsible for the attached report and conclusions expressed in it.
Audit of the Office of Justice Programs Cooperative Agreement Awarded to the Alamo Area Rape Crisis Center, dba the Rape Crisis Center, San Antonio, Texas
Investigative Summary: Findings of Misconduct by then FBI Officials for Soliciting, Procuring, and Accepting Commercial Sex while On FBI Assignment Overseas, Lack of Candor to the OIG, and Related Misconduct
Comprehensive Healthcare Inspection Summary Report: Evaluation of Leadership and Organizational Risks in Veterans Health Administration Facilities, Fiscal Year 2020
This Office of Inspector General (OIG) Comprehensive Healthcare Inspection Program report provides a descriptive evaluation of Veterans Health Administration facilities’ leadership and organizational risks. The report focuses on executive leadership position stability and engagement, accreditation surveys and oversight inspections, factors related to possible lapses in care, and Veterans Health Administration performance data.This report describes observations from healthcare inspections performed at 36 VHA medical facilities from November 4, 2019, through September 21, 2020. Each inspection involved interviews with facility leaders and staff and reviews of administrative processes. The OIG reviewers evaluated meeting minutes and other relevant documents. The results in this report are a snapshot of VHA performance at the time of the fiscal year 2020 OIG reviews.The OIG found that leaders were generally knowledgeable about their facilities and various performance metrics and could speak to actions taken to improve their respective facility’s performance. The OIG observed that lower complexity facilities had fewer reported sentinel events than higher complexity facilities.