Federal Reports

This report presents the results of our self-initiated audit of fuel expenses, cash, stamps, and money orders at the Charlotte, NC, Ballantyne Station Post Office (PO) (Project Number 22-018). This site is in the North Carolina District of the Atlantic Area. This audit was designed to provide U.S. Postal Service management with timely information on potential financial control risks at Postal Service locations.Management assigns every Postal Service-owned vehicle a Voyager Fleet card (Voyager card) to pay for its commercially purchased fuel, oil, and routine maintenance. U.S. Bank operates the Postal Service fleet card program and Voyager provides a weekly electronic transaction detail file of all Voyager card transactions to the Postal Service’s Fuel Asset Management System (FAMS) eFleet application. Site managers are responsible for monitoring Voyager card transactions in the FAMS eFleet application.The U.S. Postal Service Office of Inspector General (OIG) used data analytics to identify that the Ballantyne Station had a large number of expenses recorded to account identifier code (AIC) 594, Vehicle Supplies Expense, which were paid by cash or money order. This unit had $14,283 — or 35 percent of the North Carolina District’s total — for the period October 1, 2020, through September 30, 2021.

What We Looked AtThe Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is responsible for managing and operating the busiest and most complex airspace system in the world. The FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018 (Act) required the Secretary of Transportation to establish metrics for evaluating FAA’s management and performance related to (1) the timely and cost-effective completion of projects and (2) the effectiveness in achieving the goals for an expedited, coordinated environmental review process for major safety, security, and capacity projects. Also, the Act required our office to report on FAA’s progress. Our objectives were to determine FAA’s progress in meeting the performance targets for (1) the timely and cost-effective completion of projects and (2) the achievement of an expedited, coordinated environmental review process. What We FoundFAA did not meet its major system targets in fiscal years 2019 and 2020, and full accountability and transparency in reporting is limited. Specifically, FAA did not meet its performance measure for 90 percent of major baselined acquisition programs to be within 10 percent of the current cost, schedule, and performance baselines. Also, we found weaknesses in FAA’s reporting that limited transparency and accountability. For example, FAA does not disclose when it removes programs from the measure that exceed baselines by over 10 percent and no longer reports them. In contrast, FAA reported meeting the environmental performance target to achieve on-schedule performance for 90 percent of FAA-led major transportation projects and to reduce the average time to complete environmental reviews. However, FAA’s actual results are unclear because the Agency may not have included all major projects or captured when project milestones were late in the measure. As a result, FAA’s reporting may not provide an accurate picture on how major system investments are performing or the extent to which the Agency meets its goals in the environmental measure. Our RecommendationsWe made three recommendations to improve FAA’s reporting on performance measures for major system investments and environmental review processes. FAA concurred with one recommendation and partially concurred with two. FAA proposed appropriate planned actions.

The NASA Office of Inspector General examined whether NASA has implemented an effective insider threat program in accordance with federal policies, its own Agency policies, and cybersecurity leading practices.