An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Department of Agriculture
Partnerships for Climate-Smart Commodities – Performance Measures and Monitoring
To address occupational shortages and support hiring efforts, VA leverages federal regulations that allow agencies to offer recruitment, relocation, and retention incentives to encourage candidates to accept positions that are difficult to fill or to keep high-quality staff. The OIG conducted this audit to evaluate VA’s controls over and governance of the use of these incentives for VHA positions. Although these types of incentives were used mostly for positions on staffing shortage lists, VA did not effectively govern the incentive process to ensure responsible VHA officials consistently captured mandatory information necessary to support an incentive award. The OIG team estimated 30 percent of incentives paid during fiscal years 2020 through 2023 were missing forms, lacked a sufficient justification, or were missing signatures. As a result, VHA paid employees about $340.9 million in incentives that were not adequately supported. Furthermore, the OIG team found VHA did not consistently include sufficient workforce and succession plan narratives for an estimated 20 percent of retention incentives, note employee performance ratings for 7 percent of relocation incentives, or obtain self-certifications for about 71 percent of employees who relocated. The team also identified 28 employees who received retention incentive payments up to an additional 11 and a half years after their award period had expired. VA improperly paid about $4.6 million to these employees for incentives that should have been terminated. The OIG made eight recommendations to improve the oversight of these incentives.
This Office of Inspector General (OIG) Healthcare Facility Inspection program report describes the results of a focused evaluation of the care provided at the VA Atlanta Healthcare System in Decatur, Georgia.
This evaluation focused on five key content domains: • Culture • Environment of care • Patient safety • Primary care • Veteran-centered safety net
The OIG issued seven recommendations for improvement in five domains: 1. Culture • Infrastructure issues • Unanswered veteran phone calls 2. Environment of care • Parking garage emergency call boxes 3. Patient safety • Local test result policies and memorandums • Institutional disclosures for adverse events 4. Primary care • Panel sizes and access to care 5. Veteran-centered safety net • Medical clearances for veterans in the Compensated Work Therapy program
Closeout Financial Audit of the Sustainable Management of Forest Concessions Project, Managed by Green Gold Forestry Per S.A., Cooperative Agreement 72052721CA00004, January 1, 2023, to March 21, 2024
Audit of the Schedule of Expenditures for Mercy Corps, Prosperity through Partnership Program in West Bank and Gaza, Cooperative Agreement 72029422CA00002, March 3, 2022, to December 31, 2023
During the week of January 13, 2025, we performed a self-initiated audit at the Phoenix and West Valley Processing and Distribution Centers (P&DC) and five delivery units serviced by the P&DCs. The delivery units included the Boulder Hills, Mesa Four Peaks, and Scottsdale Stations; Avondale Goodyear Main Post Office; and Sunnyslope Carrier Annex in the Phoenix, AZ area.
We issued individual reports for the five delivery units and two P&DCs. We will also issue another report summarizing the results of our audits at all five delivery units with specific recommendations for management to address.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Inspector General conducted this evaluation to determine South Carolina’s capacity to manage and use Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act funds for its Clean Water State Revolving Fund program.
Summary of Findings
South Carolina’s Clean Water State Revolving Fund, or CWSRF, program sufficiently meets two of the four dimensions of capacity: financial and organizational. South Carolina faces challenges related to stakeholder and human capital capacity. If South Carolina does not take steps to address those challenges, millions of IIJA dollars intended for water infrastructure improvements may not reach the state’s communities.