An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Department of Justice
Recommendations Issued by the Office of the Inspector General that were Not Closed as of May 31, 2023
This report contains information about recommendations from the OIG's audits, evaluations, reviews, and other reports that the OIG had not closed as of the specified date because it had not determined that the Department of Justice (DOJ) or a non-DOJ federal agency had fully implemented them. The list omits information that DOJ determined to be limited official use or classified, and therefore unsuitable for public release.The status of each recommendation was accurate as of the specified date and is subject to change. Specifically, a recommendation identified as not closed as of the specified date may subsequently have been closed.
EPA issuance of informative BEACH Act reports would allow Congress to make informed program decisions, improve program oversight, and enhance transparency.
Audit of the Office of Justice Programs Victim Assistance Funds Subawarded by the Georgia Criminal Justice Coordinating Council to Women Moving On, Inc., Decatur, Georgia
Financial Audit of USAID Resources Managed by Deutsche Welthungerhilfe e. V. in Multiple Countries under Multiple Awards for the Year Ended December 31, 2019
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Grants Awarded to the State of New Hampshire, Fish and Game Department, From July 1, 2018, Through June 30, 2020, Under the Wildlife and Sport Fish Restoration Program
The VA Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted a healthcare inspection to assess an allegation that staff delayed providing intervention and care for a patient who died following a medical emergency at a VA outpatient clinic. The OIG identified issues related to quality of care and the facility response.The OIG substantiated that a nurse delayed initiating cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) after establishing the patient did not have a pulse and was not breathing, but was unable to determine if the delay led to the patient’s death. The OIG determined that failures in response to the medical emergency included ineffective emergency notification speakers to activate the emergency response, and incomplete incident documentation and review.During the inspection, the OIG identified concerns related to the quality of care provided to the patient in the days prior to and at the time of the incident that presented potential opportunities for additional assessment of the patient’s symptoms. Additional concerns included leaders’ response to the incident and staffs’ knowledge of the processes in place for advance healthcare planning with patients. The OIG found that in response to the incident, facility leaders conducted an emergency management debrief and completed an after-action review. However, facility leaders’ reviews of the incident were limited by a lack of information documented in the EHR, and decisions made based upon an unconfirmed determination of the patient’s cause of death.The OIG made five recommendations to the Facility Director related to ensuring proper outpatient clinic emergency processes including staff training, emergency notification, and documentation; ensuring compliance with CPR documentation; monitoring after-action plans for completion and compliance; consulting with the Office of General Counsel’s Regional Counsel to determine if an institutional disclosure is warranted; and evaluating and addressing staff’s understanding of advance care planning.