Federal Reports

We conducted a review to determine the Federal Student Aid office’s (FSA) actions to mitigate risks associated with the verification of identities in the FSA ID account creation process. Although we found that FSA had implemented controls to address identity verification risks associated with FSA ID account creation, it could take further actions by implementing preventive controls to better protect Title IV funds and the public from fraudulent activity. We found that approximately $27.3 million in Title IV funds was disbursed to suspected fraudulent FSA ID accounts. Further, although FSA has taken several steps to mitigate other risks to FSA ID accounts, these controls mitigate risks after the FSA ID account has been created and do not mitigate risk associated with the creation of the FSA ID account. We also identified a data reliability issue with the National Student Loan Data System data.

Peer Review: System Review Report on the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission's Office of Inspector General Audit Organization

The Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), enacted in August 2022 as Public Law 117-169, appropriated $3 billion to the U.S. Postal Service to assist with its delivery fleet modernization. The Act provides the Postal Service $1.29 billion in funding for the procurement of zero-emission delivery vehicles (electric vehicles) and $1.71 billion in funding for the purchase, design, and installation of the necessary charging infrastructure at Postal Service facilities.

The Clean Air Act requires delegated agencies to work with the EPA to reduce air pollution from stationary sources. From at least 2006, the EPA did not ensure that two large, delegated agencies, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, or the TCEQ, and California's South Coast Air Quality Management District, identified a subset of synthetic-minor sources of air pollution, or SM-80s. The permit limitations on SM-80s need to be clear and enforceable because, if the limitations are not adhered to, the source may operate at major source levels and should be subject to more stringent requirements. The EPA's Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance's lack of in-depth evaluations of Regions 6 and 9, lack of SM-80 requirements, and reliance on unenforceable guidance contributed to deficiencies we identified in the regional offices' oversight.

The VA Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted a healthcare inspection to review surgical service and quality management concerns at the Hampton VA Medical Center (facility) in Virginia.The OIG found facility leaders conducted three focused clinical care reviews (FCCRs) in response to concerns about the assistant chief of surgery’s surgical care. However, facility leaders failed to report the results of two FCCRs and delayed reporting the results of one FCCR to the Medical Executive Committee, and did not use multiple reviewers for interrater reliability in any of the FCCRs to ensure the reviews were “fair and objective.” Facility leaders took several privileging actions against the assistant chief of surgery. However, the OIG found multiple deficiencies with notification letters and processes, including failure to adhere to VHA policy, send extension letters, include required language within the letters, and use clear terminology. Leaders also failed to report the assistant chief of surgery to the state licensing board after identifying six cases of substandard care.Surgical staff did not complete required patient safety reports. Morbidity and mortality conferences were held in a manner that compromised the formal peer review process and resulted in negative staff experiences. The chief of surgery did not recognize the need for three substandard cases to be considered for peer review. The VISN Chief Medical Officer and the facility chief of quality, safety, and value failed to prevent a management review from including two cases that were being peer reviewed concurrently. The OIG determined that facility leaders generally did not communicate and document required institutional disclosure elements.Eleven recommendations were made to the facility director regarding FCCRs, privileging actions, state licensing board reporting, professional practice evaluations, patient safety reporting, morbidity and mortality conferences, peer review, and institutional disclosures. One recommendation was made to the VISN Director.

On December 19, 2023, the Office of Special Counsel referred a whistleblower disclosure in which a Social Security Administration (SSA) employee alleged that, “SSA Claims Examiners are not informing claimants about the potential detriment of electing to apply for spousal benefits prior to full retirement age.” The Agency referred that allegation to the Office of the Inspector General for review.