Mismanaged Surgical Privileging Actions and Deficient Surgical Service Quality Management Processes at the Hampton VA Medical Center in Virginia

The VA Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted a healthcare inspection to review surgical service and quality management concerns at the Hampton VA Medical Center (facility) in Virginia.The OIG found facility leaders conducted three focused clinical care reviews (FCCRs) in response to concerns about the assistant chief of surgery’s surgical care. However, facility leaders failed to report the results of two FCCRs and delayed reporting the results of one FCCR to the Medical Executive Committee, and did not use multiple reviewers for interrater reliability in any of the FCCRs to ensure the reviews were “fair and objective.” Facility leaders took several privileging actions against the assistant chief of surgery. However, the OIG found multiple deficiencies with notification letters and processes, including failure to adhere to VHA policy, send extension letters, include required language within the letters, and use clear terminology. Leaders also failed to report the assistant chief of surgery to the state licensing board after identifying six cases of substandard care.Surgical staff did not complete required patient safety reports. Morbidity and mortality conferences were held in a manner that compromised the formal peer review process and resulted in negative staff experiences. The chief of surgery did not recognize the need for three substandard cases to be considered for peer review. The VISN Chief Medical Officer and the facility chief of quality, safety, and value failed to prevent a management review from including two cases that were being peer reviewed concurrently. The OIG determined that facility leaders generally did not communicate and document required institutional disclosure elements.Eleven recommendations were made to the facility director regarding FCCRs, privileging actions, state licensing board reporting, professional practice evaluations, patient safety reporting, morbidity and mortality conferences, peer review, and institutional disclosures. One recommendation was made to the VISN Director.