An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Ajmal Atherton of Brooklyn, New York, pleaded guilty on August 30, 2025, in Brooklyn District Court to one count of grand larceny in the third degree and one count of offering a false instrument for filing in the second degree. Our investigation found that Atherton fraudulently obtained New York State unemployment benefits. Atherton’s conduct was identified during an investigation into an alleged financial fraud involving a former Amtrak electrician.
Closeout Financial Audit of the Community of Special Coffees Project, Managed by Central de Organizaciones Productoras de Caf y Cacao del Per, Cooperative Agreement 72052721CA00006, January 1, 2024, to February 24, 2025
Financial Audit of Global Network of Civil Society Organisations for Disaster Reduction Under Multiple Awards, for the Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2024
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) issues patents based on its examination of applications for compliance with Patent Act statutes and relevant case law.
USPTO’s Office of Patent and Quality Assurance (OPQA) performs independent quality reviews of examiner office actions to ensure decisions to either allow or reject a patent claim comply with all legal requirements. OPQA’s reviews are used to generate and report USPTO’s statutory compliance measures for quality. Our objective was to determine the effectiveness of quality reviews of continuing patent applications completed in FYs 2021–2023.
We found that USPTO needs to strengthen its quality review program to be more effective at improving patent quality. Specifically, (1) USPTO did not consistently use the results of OPQA reviews to improve the quality of continuing application examination, (2) OPQA did not ensure quality assessments were performed on compliant quality review findings, and (3) USPTO did not report certain patent examination quality errors in its annual performance reports.
These issues resulted from incomplete and insufficient policies and procedures. We made six recommendations to help USPTO strengthen its quality review program and promote high-quality patent examination and improved patent quality.
DHMG’s Oversight of the Enterprises’ Compliance with Duty to Serve Requirements Was Not Fully Effective Due to Incomplete Evaluation Documentation and Outdated Guidance