An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Nuclear Regulatory Commission
Evaluation of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Use of Anti-gag Clauses in Nondisclosure Agreements
The OIG found that the NRC’s NDAs involving federal employees do not comply with the requirements of 5 U.S.C. section 2302(b)(13). Specifically, NRC employees hired before the Whistleblower Protection Enhancement Act were not informed of their whistleblower rights, as the law required. In addition, the NRC has NDAs with other federal agencies that lack required anti-gag language. Further, the OIG found that anti-gag language is not included in NRC Form 176A, Security Acknowledgement. The OIG makes three recommendations to address the issues identified during the evaluation.
RMA Associates, LLC (RMA), under contract with the Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General, concluded that the Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) did not fully comply with Financial Acquisition Regulation and DHS requirements. Specifically, I&A’s internal guidance lacked explicit language delineating contract administration responsibilities; and I&A contract files did not contain required monitoring and closeout documentation. By not specifying the contract administration roles and responsibilities in policy, the I&A program office may duplicate efforts for contract administration. Further, incomplete contract files limit the Office of the Chief Procurement Officer’s ability to remain compliant with Federal guidance, and present readily available documentation for examination.
The Geospatial Data of 2018 (the Act) governs the collection, production, acquisition, maintenance, distribution, use, and preservation of geospatial data of covered agencies, including the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). We audited the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) efforts to meet the geospatial data requirements stated in the Act. The Act requires the Inspector General of a covered agency to audit HUD’s efforts to meet the Geospatial data requirements stated in 43 U.S.C. § 2808 at least once every 2 years and report the findings to Congress.The 16 covered agencies, including HUD, will remain in the implementation stage of the Act until the Federal Geographic Data Committee establishes formal standards for use in determining compliance with the responsibilities stated in the Act. HUD met all 13 responsibilities stated in the Act of 2018 regarding its collection, production, acquisition, maintenance, distribution, use, and preservation of geospatial data, as part of the implementation phase of the Act. Two previous audits during fiscal years 2020 and 2022 identified a lack of adequate resources as a recurring challenge that prevented HUD from fully meeting its responsibilities under the Act. However, this year, OIG found HUD now has the necessary resources to meet the responsibilities and implement the geospatial program. In addition, HUD successfully executed a formal 5-year contract for the management of its Geocode Services Center, which is used to help meet geospatial objectives and responsibilities. As a result, HUD is meeting the responsibilities and is positioning itself to meet the responsibilities stated in the Act once the implementation phase ends. HUD’s efforts during this audit period promote transparency and accountability by providing accurate information towards achieving the Act’s purpose to minimize duplication of geospatial activities across agencies and improving collaboration.There are no recommendations.
Objective: To determine whether the Social Security Administration accurately applied the law and policy pertaining to disability waiting period exclusions for Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance beneficiaries.
A junior tamper was terminated following a disciplinary hearing on September 8, 2023. The former employee violated company policy when he transported a firearm in his personal vehicle, without authorization, on company property during a shift spanning March 1 and March 2, 2023