An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Department of the Interior
Independent Auditors’ Performance Audit Report on the U.S. Department of the Interior Federal Information Security Modernization Act for Fiscal Year 2021
Audit of the Schedule of Expenditures of Centre for Urban and Regional Excellence, Level Up for Taps and Toilets in Slum Homes Program in India, Cooperative Agreement AID-386-A-15-00002, April 1, 2020, to March 31, 2021
An Amtrak train attendant based in New Orleans, Louisiana, was terminated from employment on April 4, 2022, following his administrative hearing. The employee was terminated after our investigation resulted in criminal charges for making false statements and theft of government funds. He pleaded guilty to these charges on April 27, 2022.Our investigation found the former employee fraudulently received unemployment benefits provided under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act. The employee was not eligible to receive the funds as he was employed by Amtrak during this time and the loan application form he submitted contained false information. The employee received an $89,583 Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loan by falsifying information in the loan application. He will be sentenced at a future date.
In September 2021, the Atlanta Journal Constitution reported on large quantities of unopened mail being stored in the warehouse basement of the VA medical facility in Atlanta. The OIG conducted a review that found the Atlanta VA Health Care System (HCS) had formed a task force to open, sort, and process stacks of mail reportedly piled as high as 10 feet and dating back at least 10 months. When opened, the 17,660 pieces of mail contained medical records, claims, nearly $207,000 in checks, and correspondence from veterans.The mail backlog began accruing after a November 2020 verbal agreement between Atlanta VA HCS officials and VHA’s Payment Operations and Management (POM) personnel. The agreement called for POM staff to vacate space in a building leased by the medical facility where POM was processing mail if Atlanta VA HCS personnel took over the responsibility for processing that mail.The OIG determined that VA should have established a formal agreement clearly detailing each office’s responsibilities. VA HCS leaders did not include responsible managers in decision making discussions and lacked a clear understanding of the volume of mail processing work they were accepting. Atlanta VA HCS did not ensure mailroom staff were adequately prepared or trained to handle or sort the influx of mail, and POM officials were later reluctant to help, citing the verbal agreement.Given the mail mismanagement in Atlanta, VHA should ascertain the effects the mail processing delays had on veterans and community care providers and take corrective action. Because POM is implementing similar transitions at sites across the country, POM and medical facilities need to ensure there is adequate staff with sufficient training to handle the mail processing workload. VA concurred with the OIG’s five recommendations.
We conducted a performance audit of three National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) awards issued to the Arizona Commission on the Arts (Commission) – Awards No. 17-6100-2062 (2017award), 180989-61-18 (2018 award), and 1855979-61-19 (2019 award). Based on our review, wedetermined that the Commission generally met the financial and compliance requirementsestablished in the award documents. However, we also determined the following areas requireimprovement. Specifically, the Commission:1. Reported $36,483 in costs incurred outside the award period on its FFRs - $4,272 for the2018 award and $32,211 for the 2019 award;2. Did not report a subaward that met the Federal Financial Accountability andTransparency Act reporting requirement; and3. Did not verify potential contractors were eligible to participate in Federal awards.Based on our review, we are questioning $36,483 in reported costs. As a result, we determinedthe Commission did not meet the cost share/match requirement for the 2018 award, resulting in apotential refund due to the NEA totaling $2,136. The report includes three recommendations tothe Commission and two to the NEA to address these findings. The Commission concurred withthese findings and recommendations.
Management Advisory Memorandum: Notification of a Need to Heighten Awareness of and Compliance with Laws and Regulations Relating to Procurements from Foreign Countries