An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
U.S. Agency for International Development
Performance Audit of Cost Incurred by Blumont Engineering Solutions, Inc. for the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2019,
Financial Audit of USAID Resources Managed by Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration Under Cooperative Agreement AID-624-A-15-00009, January 1 to December 31, 2021
Financial Audit of USAID Resources Managed by SANRU ASBL in the Democratic Republic of the Congo Under Cooperative Agreement 72066020CA00003, October 1, 2020, to September 30, 2021
Financial Audit of USAID Resources Managed by Project Concern Zambia Under Cooperative Agreement 72061120CA00007, October 1, 2020, to September 30, 2021
Financial Audit of USAID Resources Managed by Christian Social Services Commission in Tanzania Under Cooperative Agreement 72062120CA00008, September 30, 2020, to December 31, 2021
Payments Made to Providers Under the COVID-19 Accelerated and Advance Payments Program Were Generally in Compliance With the CARES Act and Other Federal Requirements
What We Looked AtWe performed a quality control review (QCR) on the single audit that Mauldin & Jenkins performed for the South Carolina Department of Transportation's (SCDOT) fiscal year that ended June 30, 2021. During this period, SCDOT expended approximately $707 million from the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) grant programs. SCDOT determined that DOT's major programs were the Highway Planning and Construction Cluster and the Formula Grants for Rural Areas.Our QCR objectives were to determine whether (1) the audit work complied with the Single Audit Act of 1984, as amended, and the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Guidance, and the extent to which we could rely on the auditor's work on DOT's major programs and (2) the SCDOT's reporting package complied with the reporting requirements of the Uniform Guidance.What We FoundMauldin & Jenkins' audit work complied with the requirement of the Single Audit Act, the Uniform Guidance, and DOT's major programs. We found nothing to indicate that Mauldin & Jenkins' opinion on each of DOT's major programs was inappropriate or unreliable. However, we identified a deficiency in SCDOT's reporting package that required correction and resubmission.