An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Department of Justice
Audit of the Federal Bureau of Investigation Annual Financial Statements Fiscal Year 2023
An Amtrak Senior manager based in Philadelphia was terminated from employment on December 8, 2023, as the result of our investigation that found he submitted falsified applications to the Small Business Administration for a Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act Economic Injury Disaster Loan. In addition, the former employee signed a civil settlement agreement with the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Middle District of Florida, and agreed to pay $25,441 in restitution related to the fraudulent loan.
Cahaba Government Benefits Administrators, LLC, Properly Updated the Medicare Segment Pension Assets and Overstated Medicare's Share of the Medicare Segment Excess Pension Liabilities as of December 31, 2018
The OIG reviewed the Veterans Health Administration’s (VHA’s) assessment and management of inpatient alcohol withdrawal following several OIG inspections where adverse clinical outcomes associated with alcohol withdrawal, likely contributing to patient deaths, were identified. Determining the severity of alcohol withdrawal is critical in facilitating treatment decisions that may prevent the progression of symptoms which could be fatal.Inpatient management of alcohol withdrawal is not specifically addressed in current VHA clinical guidance, and it does not fall under one VHA national program office. The OIG evaluated national and system-level written guidance for specificity to inpatient management of alcohol withdrawal in four key areas: determination of alcohol withdrawal severity, inpatient treatment of alcohol withdrawal, inpatient staff training for assessing alcohol withdrawal severity, and oversight for inpatient management of alcohol withdrawal (guidance and monitoring).The OIG found healthcare systems lacked written guidance related to assessing and reassessing alcohol withdrawal severity; determining the appropriate inpatient level of care; evaluating co-occurring conditions; consulting with substance use disorder experts; and pharmacotherapy. Written guidance was also lacking for when nurses should consult prescribers based on patients' alcohol withdrawal severity, when prescribers should evaluate patients face-to-face based on nursing assessment findings, and when to transfer care.Written guidance for inpatient management of alcohol withdrawal could decrease the risk of adverse patient safety outcomes and, along with training, facilitate knowledge of proper administration and consistency of assessments. Detailed expectations for oversight and monitoring would allow for quality of care to be evaluated and assessed for compliance with available substance use disorder guidance.The OIG made three recommendations to the Under Secretary for Health related to consideration of identifying a national office responsible for oversight, implementing written guidance for the management of alcohol withdrawal across inpatient settings, and implementing inpatient staff training on standardized alcohol withdrawal severity scales.
The VA Office of Inspector General (OIG) reviewed a former VA surgeon’s eligibility to provide health care as a participant in VA’s Community Care Network (CCN) and the Marion VA Health Care System’s (facility) management of community care patient safety events.The OIG identified multiple failures by third-party administrator (TPA), Optum, and VA Office of Integrated Veteran Care (IVC) that undermined credentialing and oversight processes, and ultimately allowed the subject surgeon to practice in the VA community care program. First, Optum failed to address concerns identified by a third-party certified verification organization in the surgeon’s 2018 credentialing file. Second, imprecise language in the VA’s contract with the TPA did not provide adequate guidance for Optum in determining whether to exclude the surgeon from the CCN. Additionally, IVC failed to identify inconsistencies in the surgeon’s credentialing file that should have impacted credentialing decisions. Finally, misapplication of privacy rules prevented Optum’s leaders from releasing important information to IVC relevant to the surgeon’s voluntary relinquishment of the Florida medical license. The OIG concluded that the facility’s patient safety training did not include completing patient safety event reports for events in the community and the patient safety manager was unaware of the ability to contact the TPA for updates on the status of patient safety concerns reported to the TPA.The OIG made two recommendations to the Under Secretary for Health related to review of the surgeon’s eligibility to participate in the CCN and CCN contract; four recommendations to the IVC Executive Director related to ensuring Optum’s sufficient review, documentation, and compliance of CCN providers; one recommendation to the VISN Director to review all community care provided by the surgeon; and one recommendation to the Facility Director related to patient safety event report education and follow-up.