An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Department of Housing and Urban Development
The Houston Housing Authority, Houston, TX, Needs To Improve Its Procurement and Financial Operations and Its Housing Choice Voucher Program Subsidy Determinations
Most of the New Jersey Department of Human Services' (State agency) claims for Federal Medicaid reimbursement for partial care services did not comply with Federal and State requirements. The partial care services program provides individualized outpatient clinic services (e.g., group and individual therapy, prevocational services, and medication management) to beneficiaries with mental illness to reduce unnecessary hospitalization. On the basis of our sample results, we estimated that the State agency improperly claimed at least $94.8 million in Federal Medicaid reimbursement for partial care services that did not meet Federal and State requirements.
Connect for Health Colorado (Colorado marketplace), the health insurance exchange established by the State of Colorado under the provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, did not expend $9.7 million of Federal establishment grant funds in accordance with Federal requirements. Specifically, the Colorado marketplace (1) did not adequately document costs that it charged to the establishment grants ($4.4 million); (2) charged costs to the establishment grants for unallowable contract costs whose periods of benefit occurred after December 31, 2014 ($4.5 million), which was contrary to Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services guidance regarding the expenditure of establishment grant funds; (3) improperly transferred costs from one establishment grant to another without demonstrating that the transfers were performed to correct bookkeeping or clerical errors ($312,000); and (4) did not efficiently and effectively administer establishment grant funds including improperly awarded bonuses, overpayments to subgrantees, unallowable promotional giveaway items, excessive and unreasonable tips, vendor rebates that were not credited to the establishment grants, and unallowable social activities ($463,000).
Claims for outpatient physical therapy services provided by a physical therapy practice (the practice), with offices located in Southern California, did not comply with Medicare requirements. Specifically, of the 100 beneficiary days in our random sample, the practice properly claimed Medicare reimbursement for 68 beneficiary days. However, the practice improperly claimed Medicare reimbursement for the remaining 32 beneficiary days, which had therapy services that were not medically necessary. On the basis of our sample results, we estimated that the practice improperly received at least $267,000 in Medicare reimbursement for outpatient physical therapy services that did not comply with Medicare requirements.
Inpatient rehabilitation (rehab) hospitals are freestanding facilities that specialize in providing intensive rehab therapy to patients recovering from illness, injury, or surgery. This intensive therapy requires endurance that some patients receiving post-acute care do not have, potentially causing those patients to be better suited for an alternate setting such as a skilled nursing facility. Medicare criteria for admission to post-acute care help ensure that patients receive the most appropriate care for their conditions and needs. In conducting a medical review for a separate evaluation to identify adverse events in inpatient rehab hospitals, physician reviewers found a small number of hospital stays in which the patients appeared to be unsuited for intensive therapy. In response, we extended our medical review to provide additional information about these stays in which patients were unable to actively participate in and benefit significantly from intensive therapy.
The Ohio State University monitored subrecipients and claimed costs as a subrecipient in accordance with National Institutes of Health grant polices and Federal regulations. Accordingly, this report contains no recommendations.