An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
U.S. Agency for International Development
USAID Implemented Application Controls for DATA Act Reports but Improvements Are Needed
Healthcare Inspection – Evaluation of System-Wide Clinical, Supervisory, and Administrative Practices, Oklahoma City VA Health Care System, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
OIG conducted an inspection in response to Senator James Inhofe’s request to evaluate clinical, supervisory, and administrative practices at the Oklahoma City VA Health Care System (System), Oklahoma City, OK. We also evaluated the System Director’s concerns and coordinated parts of this review with The Joint Commission. Our comprehensive review identified multiple program areas, processes, and operations needing improvement. The root cause for many of these issues was poor and unstable leadership at a number of levels, most notably in the Director position. Without strong and effective leadership, an inattentive and apathetic organizational culture evolved that allowed problems to arise and persist. It was only after new leadership was installed in May 2016 that the culture improved and necessary changes took place. We made 24 recommendations.
OIG conducted a healthcare inspection to address concerns received from Congressman Jim Costa in 2014 regarding allegations from an anonymous complainant of Emergency Department (ED)-boarded patients’ length of stay, poor inpatient flow, and nurse staffing shortages at the Central California VA Health Care System (system), Fresno, CA. An anonymous complainant with similar allegations contacted the OIG Hotline in December 2013, July 2014, and February 2015. We requested system leaders respond to the allegations and in their May 2015 response, they acknowledged issues with ED-boarded patients’ length of stay, inpatient flow, and registered nurse staffing, and implemented an improvement plan with 15 actions. In January 2016, we conducted a review of system leaders’ progress after 6 months (July 1, 2015 through December 31, 2015) of implementing their action plans. We found that they did not implement 1 of the 15 actions: system leaders had not established written protocols to identify a process to transfer ED-boarded patients to available VA and non-VA facilities when acute inpatient beds were unavailable. In addition, the system’s policy that addressed the designated location for ED patient overflow did not identify criteria for ED-boarded patients who could be transferred to the Community Living Center. In the course of our review, we identified a patient whose adverse outcome illustrated many of the challenges associated with ED-boarded patients who need to be transferred due to the lack of available inpatient beds. The patient died after a prolonged transport on the maximal dose of a medication generally used in critical care. We made eight recommendations.
For a covered outpatient drug to be eligible for Federal reimbursement under the Medicaid program's drug rebate requirements, manufacturers must pay rebates to the States for the drugs. However, a prior OIG review found that States did not always invoice and collect all rebates due for drugs administered by physicians.
We determined that the Department has addressed the requirements of the Cybersecurity Act of 2015. However, the Department faces challenges effectively sharing cyber threat information across Federal and private sector entities. For example, the system DHS uses does not provide the contextual data needed to effectively defend against threats. DHS lacks a cross-domain information processing solution and automated tools to analyze and share threat information timely. DHS needs to enhance its outreach program to increase participation and improve coordination of information sharing across its partners. Further, our security testing identified configuration and patch management deficiencies related to the systems DHS uses to process and share threat information. We made five recommendations to the National Protection Programs Directorate (NPPD) to enhance the overall effectiveness of DHS’ information sharing program, including acquiring technologies needed for cross-domain sharing and automated analysis of cyber threat data, enhancing outreach to promote sharing, and implementing required security controls on selected information systems. The component concurred with all five recommendations.