Federal Reports

We performed this review to determine the extent to which State Education Agencies (SEAs) and local educational agencies (LEAs) use digital wallets to facilitate the administration of U.S. Department of Education (Department) grant funds. Our review covered the period from October 1, 2022, through December 31, 2024.  Forty-five SEAs responded to our survey regarding the use of digital wallets to facilitate the administration of Department grant funds. Twelve of those SEAs reported using digital wallets to help administer some of their Department grants during our review period, and three of these planned to continue using digital wallets in 2025. SEAs primarily relied on one digital wallet vendor to help administer their Department grant funds. That vendor, used by 11 of the 12 SEAs, was responsible for helping to administer more than 95 percent of the Department grant funds for which SEAs reported using digital wallets. SEAs used digital wallets almost exclusively for their pandemic relief Department grants, including the Governor’s Emergency Education Relief Fund, Emergency Assistance to Non-Public Schools grants, and Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief Fund grants. SEAs most commonly used digital wallets for automated direct deposit reimbursement or payment, built in controls for fund use, and tracking of funds; and several SEAs reported that they relied, at least partially, on their digital wallet vendors to help ensure that applicable Federal grant requirements were followed. According to the SEAs that responded to our survey, a small number of LEAs used digital wallets to help administer their Department grant funds during our review period. Only one SEA reported that its LEAs used digital wallets, and that SEA further reported that only 5 to 10 LEAs in the State used digital wallets. Although LEAs’ use of digital wallets appeared to be limited based on the survey results, the full extent of LEAs’ digital wallet usage is not known since 6 SEAs did not complete the survey and 15 of the 45 respondent SEAs reported that they did not know whether their LEAs used digital wallets to help administer Department grant funds. 

OIG performed an inspection of the Office of the Chief Economist to determine the likely level of sophistication an attacker would need to compromise selected U.S. Department of Agriculture systems or data.

This Office of Inspector General (OIG) Healthcare Facility Inspection program report describes the results of a focused evaluation of the care provided at the VA St. Louis Healthcare System in Missouri. This evaluation focused on five key content domains:
•    Culture
•    Environment of care
•    Patient safety
•    Primary care
•    Veteran-centered safety net
The OIG issued five recommendations for improvement in two domains:
1.    Environment of care
•    Supply storage locations and expired supplies
•    Video laryngoscope supplies
•    Safe and clean patient care areas
•    Preventive maintenance for biomedical equipment
2.    Patient safety
•    Service-level workflows and processes to monitor patient test result communications

The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted this self-initiated audit to assess how effectively the NCUA shared cyber threat information. Our objectives were to determine whether the NCUA: 1) effectively used shared cyber threat information for the supervision of credit unions; and 2) implemented effective processes to share cyber threat information to support credit union and financial system resiliency.

Our audit determined that the NCUA needs to mature its governance processes for cyber threat information sharing to support supervision of credit unions more effectively during a cybersecurity event or incident that may increase risk to the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund (Share Insurance Fund or SIF) and financial services sector stability. Additionally, the NCUA should improve its ability to acquire, analyze, and use cyber threat information for internal analysis and external response. We made eight recommendations in our report and management agreed to all the recommendations.

The United States Coast Guard (Coast Guard) did not meet its illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing interdiction goals for fiscal years 2023 and 2024. For both FYs, the Coast Guard set its interdiction goal at 40 percent. This goal reflects efforts to prevent illegal foreign fishing vessels from encroaching on the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). It measures the percent of detected vessels successfully interdicted by the Coast Guard.

The Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) fiscal year 2023 Operation Stonegarden performance measure—prosecuted narcotic cases—accurately reflected Operation Stonegarden’s contributions to the President’s National Drug Control Strategy (the Strategy). Specifically, FEMA’s prosecuted narcotic cases measure reflects one of the Strategy’s key goals, namely, to reduce the supply of illicit substances in the United States.