An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
The Peace Corps mission is made possible by Volunteers, and, through its oversight, OIG remains committed to supporting their overall safety, well-being, and success. Evaluations are a key tool in helping OIG fulfill its mission to provide independent oversight of Peace Corps operations and programs. Specifically, post evaluations address efficiency and effectiveness, identify best practices, and recommend improvements to help Peace Corps achieve its mission: to promote world peace and friendship through community-based development and cross-cultural understanding.
The evaluation revealed opportunities for improvement across all five of the objectives OIG assessed at Peace Corps/Madagascar, including notable issues with host country agreements, safety and security training and procedures, Volunteer housing, and the post’s assessment of referral healthcare facilities and consultants.
This report presents the results of our audit of service and operational performance at previously audited mail processing facilities.
Background
The U.S. Postal Service needs effective and productive operations to fulfill its mission of providing prompt, reliable, and affordable mail service. It has a vast transportation network that moves mail and equipment between approximately 315 mail processing facilities. During fiscal years 2023 and 2024, we audited 24 mail processing facilities, assessing transportation and processing operational efficiency.
What We Did
Our objective was to evaluate trends in service and operational performance at previously audited mail processing facilities to determine potential areas for improvement. For this audit, we interviewed regional and mail processing facility management, analyzed pertinent Postal Service system data for 24 previously audited mail processing facilities, and revisited six of these facilities.
What We Found
We identified persistent issues in the areas of delayed mail reporting, late and canceled outbound trips, and safety and security policies. In addition, though scanning compliance improved at some facilities, scanning scores were still generally below the goal. We also found that service performance for First‑Class Mail stayed relatively consistent, but was below target, while service for Priority Mail and Ground Advantage declined. While the lack of oversight by management continues to contribute to most of the issues found, the Postal Service has opportunities to improve information accuracy and enforcement of existing policy. Specifically, facilities continued to have inaccurate reporting of delayed mail in the Mail Condition Visualization system due to a lack of training and out-of-date policy. We found incomplete scanning load and unload data was due to a lack of scanner availability and accountability. Many of these facilities continue to have high late and canceled outbound trip percentages caused by inconsistent reviews of transportation schedules. Finally, we found that facilities did not consistently follow mail safety and security policies and procedures.
This Office of Inspector General (OIG) Healthcare Facility Inspection program report describes the results of a focused evaluation of the care provided at the VA Alexandria Healthcare System in Pineville, Louisiana.
This evaluation focused on five key content domains: • Culture • Environment of care • Patient safety • Primary care • Veteran-centered safety net
The OIG issued one recommendation for VA to correct an identified deficiency in one domain: 1. Patient safety • Providers communicate test results to patients in a timely manner
This Office of Inspector General (OIG) Healthcare Facility Inspection program report describes the results of a focused evaluation of the care provided at the Jonathan M. Wainwright Memorial VA Medical Center in Walla Walla, Washington.
This evaluation focused on five key content domains: • Culture • Environment of care • Patient safety • Primary care • Veteran-centered safety net
The OIG issued nine recommendations for VA to correct identified deficiencies in two domains: 1. Environment of care • Signs and maps • Emergency generator and fire door inspection and testing • Environment of care committee meetings • Mental Health Residential Rehabilitation Treatment Program area cleanliness • Hands-free sanitizer dispensers • Guidance for shelter-in-place supplies 2. Patient safety • Service-level workflows for the communication of test results • Process to monitor the communication of test results • Improvement actions from root cause analyses
The Inspector General Act of 1978, as amended, requires each inspector general to prepare semiannual reports for Congress. As part of that reporting, the inspector general must identify all recommendations from the prior reporting period for which corrective actions have not been completed by the agency, as well as any management decisions with respect to audit, inspection, or evaluation reports issued during that prior reporting period.
Summary of Findings
For this compendium, we compiled recommendations that we had reported as resolved in the semiannual report to Congress that we issued on May 30, 2025. These 80 recommendations were originally issued to the EPA over a span of more than 15 years, from fiscal year 2008 through fiscal year 2024. As of May 31, 2025, 78 of those recommendations remained open, representing $43.3 million in potential cost savings. Of these 78 recommendations, 43 recommendations, with $33.3 million in potential cost savings, remained open after three years or will be older than three years by their expected completion dates. Additionally, 15 recommendations that were issued in reports between July 2022 and May 31, 2025, remain unresolved. We also identified 13 recommendations, 12 resolved and one unresolved, with potential monetary benefits of nearly $865.8 million, that we deem as high priority.
The Emergency Department Construction Project at the Audie L. Murphy Memorial Veterans’ Hospital in San Antonio, Texas, Did Not Follow VA and Industry Equipment Design Standards
The OIG conducted this review after receiving a hotline allegation that the 2024 emergency department expansion and renovation at the Audie L. Murphy Memorial Veterans’ Hospital in San Antonio, Texas, did not meet standards. Some exam rooms were said to put patients at risk because the rooms were not equipped for urgent care.
The OIG confirmed the allegation. Fast-track exam rooms, used to quickly assess and treat patients with minor injuries or illnesses, did not have permanent medical air, oxygen, and vacuum outlets, nor did all the rooms have acceptable exam lights. In addition, in one room the contractor failed to install the required plumbing for permanent medical air, oxygen, and vacuum lines. The deficiencies occurred in part because the VHA directive guiding minor construction projects did not incorporate the legal requirement that the director of the Office of Construction and Facilities Management (CFM) manage and oversee the project. Other factors included the contractor’s use of the wrong template to design fast-track rooms and the project engineer’s approval of the room that lacked required plumbing.
When fast-track rooms and procedural and general exam rooms lack the necessary equipment for emergency care, patient care may be delayed while healthcare professionals locate portable equipment. VA officials agreed with the OIG’s four recommendations to ensure processes and guidance are in place for the CFM to provide appropriate oversight and management over minor construction projects, revise the VHA directive on minor construction projects to incorporate legal requirements, review emergency department exam and fast-track rooms for compliance with standards, and review a CFM assessment of emergency department for compliance with design and equipment requirements.