Federal Reports

Our evaluation’s objective was to assess NTIA’s implementation of the Public Wireless Supply Chain Innovation Fund program. We determined the steps NTIA took to award and disburse program funds, the challenges NTIA faced while implementing the program, and the status of awards and disbursements. 

We found that although NTIA has taken steps to mitigate some challenges it faced when implementing the Innovation Fund program, it would benefit from developing a comprehensive strategic plan that would ensure the program’s success. We found that NTIA did not have a sufficient strategy for anticipating emerging industry challenges, had not fully developed program goals and strategic objectives that align with the program’s statutory objectives, and did not develop a comprehensive staffing plan before it began awarding grants. 

The lack of an adequate strategic plan limits NTIA’s ability to effectively measure the program’s performance and mitigate future challenges. With over $853 million in grant funds left to award, issues may continue to arise if NTIA does not improve its program planning.

Our Objective(s)To determine (1) whether Bowman & Company, LLPs work complied with the Single Audit Act of 1984, as amended, and the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Guidance, and the extent to which we could rely on the auditor's work on the U.S. Department of Transportations (DOT) major programs, and (2) whether the Delaware River Port Authoritys reporting package complied with the reporting requirements of the Uniform Guidance.
Why This AuditDuring the fiscal year that ended on December 31, 2022, the Delaware River Port Authority expended approximately $32 million from DOT programs. Bowman & Company determined DOTs major programs were FTAs Federal Transit Cluster, FHWAs Highway Planning and Construction Cluster, and OSTs National Infrastructure Investments Discretionary Grant Program. We performed a quality control review on the single audit conducted by Bowman & Company to ensure compliance with all Federal laws and regulations.
What We FoundReview of Audit Work

Bowman & Company complied with the requirements of the Single Audit Act, the Office of Management and Budget's Uniform Guidance, and DOTs major programs.
We found nothing to indicate that Bowman & Companys opinion on DOT's major programs was inappropriate or unreliable.

Review of Reporting Package

We did not identify any deficiencies that required correction and resubmission of the Port Authoritys reporting package.

RatingWe assigned Bowman & Company an overall rating of Pass.

VA asked the OIG to conduct an audit of a contractor whose billing practices were concerning. The contractor, which provided eligible veterans with wheelchair van and other nonemergency transportation services to and from medical appointments in a certain VA healthcare system, invoiced VA about $11.17 million between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021, under this contract.

The OIG conducted an assertion-based attestation examination and found the company may not have complied with contract terms related to billing for veteran transportation, resulting in an estimated $1.81 million in potential overbillings between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2021. Of this amount, $1.34 million was related to unclear contract terms and the company’s methodology for billing remote trips with multiple stops as though each drop-off was a separate trip.

The OIG also found that the company used mileage estimates instead of miles traveled and may have misclassified trips, with those errors resulting in potentially overbilling VA by an additional $470,537. According to the contractor, VA did not object or instruct the company to bill differently. VA issued a contract modification in April 2022, addressing billing of remote trips. The OIG found that the vendor complied with the billing terms of the modification for trips identified as remote. Subsequently, VA set a flat fee for each pickup and drop-off, removing the requirement to calculate billings by trip.

Except for the potential overbillings giving rise to the qualified opinion, the OIG team found the company’s assertion that it billed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the contract was fairly stated in all material respects. The OIG recommended—and VA agreed—that VA should confer with its Office of General Counsel on whether any funds could or should be recouped.

Our investigation determined that an Amtrak manager based in Philadelphia likely forged an employee’s signature on his final disciplinary waiver and a second disciplinary waiver for another employee in December 2022. On March 31, 2025, the manager was placed on administrative leave pending termination. He retired on April 8, 2025, and is no longer eligible for rehire.