An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Social Security Administration
Close-out Notice: Supplemental Security Income Eligibility Redeterminations
Our objective was to assess the Space Weather Follow-On (SWFO) program’s progress in preparing the SWFO-L1 satellite for launch and operations. To meet our objective, we reviewed SWFO-L1 satellite environmental testing, planning for integration onto the launch vehicle as a rideshare, and operational readiness reviews. We also reviewed the extent to which NOAA had policies governing the launch of space weather satellites. Additionally, we compared the program management of risk, cost, and schedule against programmatic plans. We found that the SWFO program made adequate progress in preparing for launch and operations. However, we also found that the SWFO Program Office did not conduct vibration testing using the actual flight separation system, nor did it receive a formal waiver for this deviation from “Test-As-You-Fly” (TAYF) standards. This occurred because NOAA oversight officials, as the mission sponsors, did not provide sufficient oversight to enforce TAYF requirements during vibration testing. As a result, NOAA did not have assurance that the system would not fail during launch and that the government’s interest was adequately protected.
This audit was performed by the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) on behalf of the Department of Energy’s Office of Inspector General and examined UChicago Argonne, LLC’s costs incurred and claimed for fiscal years 2021 and 2022 at the Argonne National Laboratory, under management and operating contract No. DE-AC02-06CH11357.
The audit’s objective was to determine if costs charged were allowable, allocable, and reasonable in accordance with applicable laws, regulations, and contract terms.
The DCAA performed the audit in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards.
The DCAA identified four audit findings and questioned over $13 million in indirect and direct costs, including $11,487,044 in performance fees. The performance fees represented a contractual incentive paid by the Department and were questioned by the DCAA because UChicago Argonne, LLC included the fee as a cost in the General and Administrative pool. The DCAA reconciled the performance fees to the general ledger, and the Department determined that the contractor was entitled to the earned fee. The DCAA also questioned: (1) $1,176,949 in Board of Governors expenses that were greater than the final approved expenses; (2) $47,183 in executive salaries that were more than the statutory compensation ceiling; and (3) $511,724 of direct laboratory purchase order/subcontract costs with universities because the costs were not incurred specifically for the contract.
If the issues identified by the DCAA are fully addressed, it should help ensure that costs charged to the Department are allowable, allocable, and reasonable in accordance with contract terms. We recommend that the contractor coordinate with the contracting officer to resolve the questioned costs identified in this report.
UChicago Argonne, LLC did not concur with the questioned costs and stated that like all management and operating contractors, it follows longstanding practices and Departmental guidance on performance fees and handles Board of Governors expenses per its contract.
Management Advisory: Summary of Reports on the DoD’s Healthcare Cost Recovery Programs and the Defense Health Agency’s Actions to Address Recommendations and Aged Accounts Receivable
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Inspector General conducted this evaluation to determine whether the EPA implemented effective controls during the selection of Track I grant awardees through the Community Change Grants Program within the EPA Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights.
Summary of Findings
The EPA implemented effective controls during its review and selection of Track I Community Change Grants Program applications. The EPA adhered to its Policy for Competition of Assistance Agreements and other applicable requirements during the application review process. Additionally, the EPA ensured that Track I grant awardees met the eligibility requirements stated in the Inflation Reduction Act.