An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
The Board and the Reserve Banks Generally Met the Revised Timing Goals for Certain Fair Lending Matters
An Amtrak passenger conductor based in Sacramento, California, resigned from his position on February 5, 2025, while under investigation. Our investigation found that the former employee violated company policies by engaging in outside employment while on a personal leave of absence from Amtrak.
Investigative Summary: Findings of Misconduct by a then DOJ Attorney Advisor for Conduct Prejudicial to the Government in Connection with the Attorney Advisor Engaging in Inappropriate Sexual Contact with an Intern in the Attorney Advisor’s Office
Deficiencies in Invasive Procedure Complexity Infrastructure, Surgical Resident Supervision, Information Security, and Leaders’ Response at the Lieutenant Colonel Charles S. Kettles VA Medical Center in Ann Arbor, Michigan
The VA Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted a healthcare inspection to assess allegations related to surgical services, information security, and facility leaders’ response to patient safety concerns.
The OIG substantiated the facility lacked services required to support the assigned inpatient invasive procedure complexity designation. Waivers for these services were approved; however, the OIG found delays with waiver requests and a concern with failing to monitor timeliness of patient transfers. The OIG did not substantiate a failure to meet blood bank or surgical coverage requirements but identified concerns with surgical service leaders’ engagement with the blood utilization committee and facility leaders’ failure to consider an institutional disclosure.
The OIG was unable to determine if facility leaders failed to ensure on-site supervision of postgraduate year one (PGY-1) surgery residents. The OIG found inconsistencies with interpretation of Veterans Health Administration (VHA) policy and is concerned that the Office of Academic Affiliations guidance given to Veterans Integrated Service Network (VISN) 10 leaders regarding PGY-1 surgery resident supervision does not meet the policy’s intent.
The OIG substantiated facility leaders failed to ensure information security when physicians provided unauthorized VA computer access to residents.
The OIG did not substantiate surgeons failed to meet standards for postoperative documentation or that facility leaders were unresponsive to patient safety concerns. However, the OIG found concerns with the monitoring and sustainment of related action plans.
The OIG made three recommendations to the Under Secretary for Health regarding invasive procedure complexity infrastructure, supervision of PGY-1 surgery residents, and processes related to health profession trainee computer access; three recommendations to the VISN Director regarding invasive procedure waiver requests and resolution of patient safety concerns; and six recommendations to the Facility Director regarding facility surgical infrastructure and waiver requirements, blood utilization committee participation, institutional disclosure, operative documentation compliance, and information security.
Performance Audit of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s Implementation of the Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014 for Fiscal Year 2024 Region IV: Arlington, Texas
The Office of the Inspector General contracted with Sikich CPA LLC to conduct this audit. Its objective was to assess the effectiveness of the information security policies, procedures, and practices of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV facility. The findings and conclusions presented in this report are the responsibility of Sikich. The OIG’s responsibility is to provide oversight of the contractor’s work in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards.
Based on its assessment period from April 2024 through October 2024, Sikich found that although the NRC generally implemented effective information security policies, procedures, and practices for Region IV, the agency’s implementation of a subset of selected controls was not fully effective. There were weaknesses in Region IV’s information security program and practices. As a result, two recommendations were made to assist Region IV in strengthening its information security program.