An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
National Aeronautics and Space Administration
NASA’s Compliance with the Geospatial Data Act for Fiscal Year 2022
The Geospatial Data Act seeks to foster efficient, government-wide management of geospatial data—information identifying the geographic location and characteristics of natural or constructed features and boundaries on Earth. As required by the Act, we audited NASA’s collection, production, acquisition, maintenance, distribution, use, and preservation of geospatial data.
In March 2022, we conducted unannounced inspections of six U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) facilities in the Del Rio area of Texas, specifically five U.S. Border Patrol facilities and one Office of Field Operations (OFO) port of entry. Our inspections and subsequent analysis showed that Border Patrol held 1,164 detainees in custody in four facilities longer than specified in the National Standards on Transport, Escort, Detention, and Search (TEDS), which generally limit detention in these facilities to 72 hours.
EAC OIG, through the independent public accounting firm of McBride, Lock & Associates, LLC, audited funds received by the State of California under the Help America Vote Act, including state matching funds and interest earned, totaling $216.3 million. This included Election Security, reissued Section 101, reissued Section 251, and Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act grants.
While conducting an ongoing audit of the Philadelphia Housing Authority’s (Authority) management of lead-based paint hazards in its public housing units, we identified a significant gap in HUD’s program requirements related to safe work practices, which we believe requires immediate action by HUD. We identified that the Authority determined a substantial percentage of maintenance and hazard reduction work performed on surfaces with lead-based paint in its public housing units was “de minimis”, or minor. The Authority’s determinations exempted the work from HUD’s rules requiring safe work practices. In some cases, the documentation in the Authority’s maintenance files indicated the work might have been labeled improperly as minor or “de minimis.” However, HUD does not require assisted property owners like public housing agencies (PHAs) to maintain evidence supporting that the work was minor. The lack of a requirement for assisted property owners to maintain such documentation impedes HUD’s ability to conduct meaningful oversight of property owners’ compliance with HUD’s requirements for safe work practices. The lack of a requirement also limits HUD’s and OIG’s ability to verify that the de minimis exemption is being properly applied. While this risk became apparent during our ongoing audit of a PHA, we believe this risk extends beyond HUD’s public housing program to all HUD-assisted programs where the de minimis exemption may apply. We believe HUD should take immediate steps to mitigate the risk that the exemption is being applied too broadly and thereby increasing the potential for residents and maintenance staff to be exposed to lead-based paint hazards.We recommend that HUD require assisted property owners, including PHAs, to maintain evidence to support determinations that maintenance and hazard reduction work that disturbs lead-based paint in target housing are minor such that they can be properly exempted from HUD’s safe work requirements.
Evaluation of the DoD’s Implementation of the Military Leadership Diversity Commission’s 2011 Report Recommendations and the DoD Diversity and Inclusion Strategic Plan for 2012 to 2017
The Unified Coordination Group (UCG) struggled to track Afghan evacuees who independently departed U.S. military bases designated as safe havens. Specifically, UCG officials had difficulties documenting when independent departures occurred.