An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Office of Personnel Management
IT Security Controls of OPM’s Consolidated Business Information System (CBIS) compliance with FISMA
Audit of the Federal Employees Dental and Vision Insurance Program Operations as Administered by UnitedHealthcare Insurance Company for Contract Years 2014 and 2015
At the request of the Tennessee Valley Authority's (TVA) Supply Chain, we examined the cost proposal submitted by a company for civil projects and coal combustion residual program management work at TVA's steam electric power plants. Our examination objective was to determine if the company's cost proposal was fairly stated for a planned <br> $150 million contract. In our opinion, the company's cost proposal was overstated. Specifically, we found: The company's proposals for a Cumberland Fossil Plant (CUF) project and a Bull Run Fossil Plant (BRF) project included overstated (1) equipment costs, (2) material costs, <br> (3) general and administrative (G&A) and small tool rates, and (4) labor costs. In addition, we found the company's proposed unit rate for BRF monthly maintenance was understated due to omissions in the company's unit rate cost buildup.The company's proposed labor rate attachments included (1) incorrect craft labor rates and (2) noncraft wage ranges that were not reflective of the company's actual wage ranges. In addition, the company's proposal omitted labor rate attachments for employees who receive limited or no benefits. We estimated TVA could avoid about $6.6 million on the planned $150 million contract by negotiating appropriate reductions to (1) equipment, labor, and material costs and G&A and small tools rates in the CUF proposal and (2) unit rates in the BRF proposal. In addition, we suggest TVA negotiate revisions to the company's contract rate attachments to correct errors and more accurately reflect the company's actual wage ranges.(Summary Only)
