Federal Reports

Seek link below for the full report, report summary, multimedia or any agency follow-up.

This report contains information about recommendations from the OIG’s audits, evaluations, and reviews that the OIG had not closed as of the specified date because it had not determined that the Department of Justice had fully implemented them. The information omits recommendations that the Department of Justice determined to be classified or sensitive, and therefore unsuitable for public release.The status of each recommendation was accurate as of the specified date and is subject to change. Specifically, a recommendation identified as not closed as of the specified date may subsequently have been closed.

As a follow-up to an audit of a contractor where the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) missed early payment discount opportunities of $1,029,965, we audited TVA’s management of early payment discounts on vendor invoices. Early payment discounts are offered by some contractors for payments made prior to the due dates on invoices. Our audit objective was to determine if early payment discounts are appropriately managed by TVA. Our scope included invoices from Supply Chain contracts and purchase orders with greater than $1 million in spending in any one fiscal year from October 1, 2014, through July 31, 2017. We found TVA’s management of early payment discounts needs improvement. TVA missed early payment discount opportunities of $932,340 out of $4,879,957 in early payment discounts available during our audit period. We also found early payment discount terms were generally entered accurately into TVA’s Maximo system utilized to process and approve invoices. However, we noted a few exceptions where Maximo’s payment terms did not accurately reflect the contractual payment terms.

Our objective was to determine if the U.S. Postal Service properly managed, funded, and executed its Innovation Pool Fund (Pool) in agreement with contractual terms.

We reviewed $141.6 million in increased payments made to 120 selected providers to determine whether the State agency made increased Medicaid payments appropriately. We determined that the 120 selected providers were eligible as primary care providers under Federal requirements. Therefore, the State agency appropriately made the $141.6 million in increased payments for services rendered by the selected providers and received the $136.3 million in Federal funds. Accordingly, this report contains no recommendations.

Minnesota did not comply with Federal waiver and State requirements in overseeing centers that serve vulnerable adults who receive services through the program. To protect the health and safety of vulnerable adults, Minnesota, as the licensing agency for centers, must ensure that centers follow licensing requirements in State statutes established in its application for waiver services. These licensing requirements include health and safety and administrative requirements.

Nebraska did not always verify nursing homes’ correction of deficiencies identified during surveys in calendar year (CY) 2016 in accordance with Federal requirements. We estimated that Nebraska did not obtain or maintain the nursing homes’ evidence verifying correction of deficiencies for 866 (92 percent) of the 938 deficiencies identified during surveys in CY 2016.