An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
U.S. Postal Service
Local Purchases and Payments – Franklin, PA, Post Office
OIG data analysis identified the Franklin, PA, Post Office had $15,915 in local purchases from October 1, 2017, to June 30, 2018, compared to $650 for the entire fiscal year (FY) 2017. It is unusual for one office to have such a high percentage of local purchases in less than one fiscal year. The objective was to determine whether local purchases and payments made at the Franklin, PA, Post Office were valid and properly supported.
The objective of this audit was to determine to what extent the Smithsonian ensures that required background investigations are conducted promptly on employees and certain affiliated individuals.
Closeout Examination of International Relief and Development's Compliance With the Terms and Conditions of Task Order AID-294-TO-13-00018, Sanour Arrabeh Well Rehabilitation Project, Under Indefinite Quantity Contract AID-294-I-00-12-00003, Infrastructure
Fund Accountability Statement Audit of USAID Resources Managed by Fuller Center for Housing Armenia, Advanced Rural Development Initiative Project in Armenia, Cooperative Agreement AID-111-A-13-00002, for the Year Ended December 31, 2015
Marshal Fahim National Defense University: Phase I Construction Generally Met Contract Requirements, but Non-Compliant Fire Doors and Inadequate Maintenance Place Building Occupants At Risk
The VA Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted this audit to determine whether community care providers associated with the Fayetteville, North Carolina, VA Medical Center (VAMC) stopped accepting Non-VA Care (NVC) and Veterans Choice Program (Choice) authorizations. In July 2017, the OIG received an allegation that two orthopedic community providers stopped accepting VA patients because claims were not paid timely. The OIG substantiated the allegation and determined that at least 15 community providers stopped accepting VA patients from January 2015 through July 2017 primarily because claims were not being paid timely and there was difficulty resolving unpaid claims. The VA’s Office of Community Care is responsible for paying NVC claims. The network’s third-party administrator, Health Net, is responsible for paying Choice claims. The OIG determined community providers who stopped accepting NVC authorizations waited, on average, about 46 days for their claims to be processed in 2017. The OIG also found provider frustration over unpaid Choice claims stemming from Health Net’s clearinghouse automatically rejecting some claims and not notifying providers. Fewer community providers affected the ability to schedule patients for dermatology, neurosurgery, orthopedic, and urology services in the community. Also, VA paid about $156,000 in interest on delayed payments. If there is no improvement in the timeliness of payments, and if VA staff do not effectively address community provider medical claim inquires, additional providers may stop accepting VA patients, presenting a risk of increased wait times and travel distances. The OIG made six recommendations including ensuring community care provider participation is monitored at the local level, dedicating staff needed to process medical claims, ensuring staff are not inaccurately rejecting claims and notifying providers when claims are rejected, implementing controls to ensure the timely resolution of medical claim inquiries, and overseeing procedures to ensure the resolution of medical claim inquiries.
We determined that U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) did not analyze program needs to determine how many additional 287(g) program managers should be hired and was not able to hire enough to keep up with the quick expansion. In addition, a lack of information technology (IT) support staff and a lengthy installation process have hampered prompt delivery and installation of IT equipment that law enforcement agencies in the 287(g) program need to carry out their immigration enforcement-related duties. Finally, ICE may not be training law enforcement officers efficiently and is not monitoring the officers to ensure they complete required training. We recommended that ICE address issues with 287(g) program staffing, improve the timeliness of IT equipment delivery to law enforcement agencies, and assess program participant training. We made four recommendations that will help improve program management and oversight. ICE concurred with three of four recommendations.