Federal Reports

The OIG investigated allegations that a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) official awarded or manipulated a grant to a friend in return for a favor. It was further alleged that the official benefited from a different grant that the FWS awarded to a State agency and that he may have used inside knowledge to purchase and enroll land in a Government program so he could benefit financially.We found no evidence that the FWS official awarded or manipulated any grants that benefitted himself or others. We also found no evidence that the FWS official violated any laws or rules by purchasing land and enrolling the land into a Government program.

DOL OIG Investigations Newsletter Vol. XXIV August 1 - September 30, 2019

VA is responsible for negotiating Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) prices (volume discounts) for billions of dollars of pharmaceuticals on behalf of all federal agencies. This review examined how VA administers temporary price reductions (TPRs) and the impact on government-wide contract negotiations when VA accepted TPRs offered only to certain government agencies and not all authorized FSS users. The VA OIG found that the National Acquisition Center has been routinely facilitating the award of TPRs that benefit certain agencies and exclude other authorized users. In many instances, the TPRs were exclusive to VA, resulting in additional savings for VA but not other federal agencies (sometimes inconsistent with order volume). The OIG found no authority whereby VA may award prices on the FSS for its sole benefit, or only one or more other agencies’ benefits, while allowing other federal agencies to be denied a benefit authorized by law. The OIG determined that restricting TPRs under FSS pharmaceutical contracts resulted in taxpayers paying $602 million more over two years than if all authorized users government-wide were charged the lowest TPRs for the same pharmaceuticals. Agency-specific TPRs also appear to have negatively impacted the negotiation and establishment of some FSS prices, including statutory federal ceiling prices for covered drugs. TPRs were processed as unilateral modifications, contrary to standard contracting procedures. Also, TPRs were not published as required for FSS prices, potentially reducing competition. The OIG made four recommendations, including developing and implementing a policy that prohibits agency-specific TPRs on FSS contracts, developing a policy for TPRs that exceed one year, and consulting with appropriate authorities regarding the legality of confidentiality provisions and unilateral contract modifications in FSS contracts. The OIG found VA’s nonconcurrence with the OIG recommendation to stop agency-specific TPRs to be without legal merit. VA concurred with the other three recommendations.

Under the Medicare home health prospective payment system (PPS), the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services pays home health agencies (HHAs) a standardized payment for each 60-day episode of care that a beneficiary receives. The PPS payment covers intermittent skilled nursing and home health aide visits, therapy (physical, occupational, and speech-language pathology), medical social services, and medical supplies.

For calendar years (CYs) 2012 through 2015, Medicare allowable amounts for certain back, knee, elbow, and wrist orthotic devices increased from $631.8 million to $815.5 million. We are concerned about the relationship of these increased costs to prices per orthotic device, and specifically whether Medicare allowable amounts are comparable with payments made by select non-Medicare payers.