An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Department of Justice
Audit of the Office of Justice Programs Grants Awarded to Family Pathfinders of Tarrant County, Inc. Fort Worth, Texas
The Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014 (FISMA) requires each agency’s Inspector General (IG) to conduct an annual independent evaluation to determine the effectiveness of the information security program (ISP) and practice of its respective agency. Our objective was to evaluate the Tennessee Valley Authority’s (TVA) strategy and the progress of TVA’s ISP and agency practices for ensuring compliance with FISMA and applicable standards, including guidelines issued by the Office of Management and Budget and the National Institute of Standards and Technology. Our audit scope was limited to answering the fiscal year (FY) 2017 IG metrics developed as a collaborative effort by Office of Management and Budget, Department of Homeland Security, and Council of Inspector Generals on Integrity and Efficiency in consultation with the Federal Chief Information Officer Council. The FY2017 IG FISMA metrics recommend a majority of the functions be at a maturity level 4 (managed and measurable) or higher to be considered effective. Based on our analysis of the metrics and associated maturity levels defined within the FY2017 IG FISMA metrics, we found TVA’s ISP was operating in an effective manner.
The Office of the Inspector General conducted a review of the Chief Human Resource Office’s (CHRO) organization to identify operational and cultural strengths and risks that could impact CHRO’s organizational effectiveness. Our report identified strengths within CHRO related to (1) organizational alignment, (2) development of the CHRO strategy, and (3) management support within the business units. However, we also identified risks related to (1) collaboration across the CHRO, (2) relationship and inclusion issues, (3) potential for noncompliance with the Tennessee Valley Authority's code of conduct, and (4) the potential for ineffective CHRO measurements.
The VA Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted a focused evaluation of the quality of care delivered in the inpatient and outpatient settings of the John D. Dingell VA Medical Center (facility). The review covered key clinical and administrative processes associated with promoting quality care—Leadership and Organizational Risks; Quality, Safety, and Value; Medication Management: Anticoagulation Therapy; Coordination of Care: Inter-Facility Transfers; Environment of Care; High-Risk Processes: Moderate Sedation, and Long-Term Care: Community Nursing Home Oversight. OIG also provided crime awareness briefings to 53 employees.The facility has generally stable executive leadership and active engagement with employees and patients to improve satisfaction scores. Organizational leaders support patient safety, quality care, and other positive outcomes (such as initiating processes and plans to improve perceptions of the facility through active stakeholder engagement). OIG’s review of accreditation organization findings, sentinel events, disclosures, Patient Safety Indicator data, and Strategic Analytics for Improvement and Learning (SAIL) results identified multiple organizational risk factors. The senior leadership team was knowledgeable about selected SAIL metrics and should continue to take considerable actions to improve care and performance, particularly Quality of Care and Efficiency metrics likely contributing to the current 2-star rating.OIG noted findings in four of the six areas of clinical operations reviewed and issued 10 recommendations that are attributable to the Chief of Staff, Nurse Executive, and Associate Director. The identified areas with deficiencies are:(1) Quality, Safety, and Value • Review of credentialing and privileging data(2) Medication Management: Anticoagulation Therapy• Patient education specific for newly prescribed anticoagulant medications• Employee competency assessments(3) Environment of Care• Environment of care rounds attendance• Damaged furnishings in patient care areas• Panic alarm testing• Radiation shield and apron integrity inspection and testing• Annual inspection of radiology equipment• Interdisciplinary Safety Inspection Team training(4) Long-Team Care: Community Nursing Home Oversight• Cyclical clinical visits