Federal Reports

This report presents the results of our audit of Ginnie Mae’s fiscal year 2019 financial statements, including our report on Ginnie Mae’s internal control and test of compliance with selected provisions of laws, regulations, and contracts applicable to Ginnie Mae.In fiscal year 2019, we were unable to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence to express an opinion on the fairness of Ginnie Mae’s financial statements. Specifically, our work noted significant modeling concerns affecting Ginnie Mae’s guaranty asset, guaranty liability, and allowance for loan losses, which prevented us from completing our audit work due to time constraints imposed by the statutory reporting deadlines. These issues concerned the appropriateness and reasonableness of the model methodologies, specifications, and model assumptions, which raised questions about the reliability of the significant accounting estimates produced by these models. Additionally, we were unable to audit the nonpooled loan assets due to (1) documentation challenges to support balances for claims receivable and reimbursable costs and (2) insufficient time to complete necessary audit procedures for mortgage loans held for investment and acquired properties. Given the significance of all of these limitations combined, it is our professional opinion that there may be risks that undetected misstatements that could be material may exist in these statements. Therefore, we deemed our audit scope to be insufficient to express an opinion on Ginnie Mae’s fiscal year 2019 financial statements as a whole. We have 18 new audit recommendations in this year’s report. Based on the results of our work, we identified two material weaknesses, one significant deficiency, and one reportable noncompliance with selected provisions of laws, regulations and contracts.

We are required to audit the consolidated financial statements of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) annually in accordance with the Chief Financial Officers Act of 1990 as amended. Our objectives were to express an opinion on the fair presentation of HUD’s consolidated financial statements and report on HUD’s internal controls over financial reporting and compliance with select provisions of applicable laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements. This report supplements our independent auditor’s report on the results of our audit of HUD’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2019.We expressed a qualified opinion on HUD’s consolidated financial statements for fiscal year 2019 because of the significant effects of certain unresolved audit matters, which restricted our ability to obtain sufficient, appropriate evidence about HUD’s noncredit reform loans1 and other liabilities resulting from Ginnie Mae’s guaranty asset and guaranty liability. This report provides additional details on one material weakness, three significant deficiencies, and three instances of noncompliance with laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements. The most significant finding relates to instances in which HUD’s accounting did not always comply with Federal generally accepted accounting principles. We also identified (1) weaknesses in internal controls over financial reporting, (2) weaknesses in the financial management system and computing environment, (3) financial management governance deficiencies, and (4) three instances of noncompliance with laws and regulations. These findings occurred because of insufficient policies and procedures and limitations with HUD’s financial management systems.Current recommendations are included after each finding, while outstanding prior-year recommendations are included in the Followup on Prior Audits section of this report. Most significant are those in which we recommend that HUD (1) improve its validation methodology for accrued grant liabilities and (2) develop, implement, and improve policies and procedures.

Desarrollar pautas de la EPA para recopilar y comunicar datos sobre la calidad del aire podría mejorar el nivel de confianza del público con respecto a la agencia durante respuestas a futuras catástrofes.

Oversight and management of grant programs is crucial to the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' (HHS) mission and to the health and well-being of the public. Audits of Head Start and other HHS grantees have found deficiencies in the way grantees claim and account for grant funds.The objective of our audit was to determine whether Opportunities for Williamson and Burnet Counties (Opportunities) claimed and accounted for HHS grant funds in accordance with Federal requirements.

OIG evaluated RHS’ controls over tenant eligibility to occupy multi-family rental housing in rural areas

Every 6 months we provide Congress with a report detailing our independent oversight of ARC during the reporting period

In October 2015, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) approved New York's Community First Choice option (CFCO). The approval allowed New York to receive an additional 6 percent of Federal Medical Assistance Percentage (FMAP), referred to as "enhanced FMAP," for eligible home and community-based services and supports provided to individuals that would otherwise require an institutional level of care.