Federal Reports

The OIG examined whether disability benefit adjustments were calculated accurately for veterans who served in the Reserve or National Guard. These veterans may have been eligible for military training pay, or “drill pay.” However, they are not entitled to receive drill pay and disability benefits in the same fiscal year. The Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) asks veterans to choose between drill pay and disability benefits, and adjusts payment accordingly. VBA adjusts most payments using an automated process, except staff should manually adjust payments if the veterans have spent days in active duty status. This helps ensure they did not receive disability and drill pay benefits in the same fiscal year. The review team found that VBA inaccurately processed about 11 percent of adjustments in fiscal year (FY) 2016, resulting in an estimated $14.2 million in overpayments and underpayments to veterans. The team noted that VBA did not review the accuracy of automatically completed adjustments and that the automated system was not programmed to remove some cases that required manual processing. Staff in VBA’s Intake Processing Center were also unfamiliar with procedures to remove cases from the automated system when veterans responded to letters about proposed benefits. The review team found that training for VBA staff lacked detailed instructions on completing disability benefit adjustments. The OIG recommended that VBA review FY 2016 drill pay adjustments involving active duty periods and take corrective action as necessary. The OIG also recommended a review of FY 2016 adjustments that involved a veteran responding to VBA’s letter about proposed drill pay. Further, VBA should remind staff of their responsibilities for processing responses and implement a plan to ensure compliance. Finally, the OIG recommended that VBA implement a plan to provide detailed training for staff who process drill pay adjustments and monitor the training’s effectiveness.

For the final report on our audit of the Department of Commerce’s (the Department’s) Enterprise Web Solutions (EWS) system, our objectives were to determine whether the (1) processes used to vet contract staff given administrative access to the EWS system are adequate; (2) Department followed a sufficient process to identify the impact level of the EWS system; (3) Office of the Chief Information Officer took appropriate actions to protect the information on the EWS system after it was granted an authorization to operate in 2018; and (4) contract used to procure EWS services and systems complied with Department acquisition regulations. Because of the serious nature of the cybersecurity issues identified, we determined that this audit report would address the first three objectives, while a separate, follow-on audit may address the fourth. We found that the Department did not protect sensitive data on the EWS system. Many of the problems we identified indicated that the Department had serious and pervasive issues that allowed exposure of sensitive data.Specifically, we found the following:I. The Department exposed sensitive data to unvetted foreign nationals working outside the United States.II. Unauthorized foreign nationals accessed and modified the EWS system after their contract had been terminated.III. The Department mishandled the response to unauthorized access by foreign nationals.IV. The Department failed to account for sensitive data on its systems.

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) requested that OIG audit a mail-order pharmacy's Medicare Part D Eligibility Verification Transactions (E1 transactions). To address CMS's request, we conducted this audit of E1 transactions, which included the requested provider's transactions. During our audit, we discovered that providers were taking advantage of gaps in CMS's program integrity in E1 transactions. Because E1 transactions contain beneficiary protected health information (PHI), we wanted to verify that the providers were appropriately using E1 transactions for their intended purposes.

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) provides funding through numerous programs that support and provide assistance to low-income families. Our prior audit (A-04-14-04026) of Wateree Community Actions, Inc. (Wateree), for fiscal years (FYs) 2012 and 2013, found that Wateree improperly managed some Federal funds related to HHS programs. As a result, Wateree put at risk both vital Federal funds and its ability to continue as a viable organization assisting low-income households in South Carolina.

The National Credit Union Administration Office of Inspector General contracted with Moss Adams LLP to conduct a Material Loss Review of C B S Employees Federal Credit Union, a federally insured credit union. We reviewed the Credit Union to: (1) determine the cause(s) of the Credit Union’s failure and the resulting estimated $39.5 million loss to the National Credit Union Share Insurance Fund (Share Insurance Fund); (2) assess the NCUA’s supervision of the Credit Union; and (3) provide appropriate suggestions and/or recommendations to prevent future losses.