An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
U.S. Agency for International Development
Financial Audit of USAID Resources Managed by Moi University College of Health Sciences in Kenya Under Multiple Awards, July 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024
Financial Audit of the Greater Transparency and Best Practices in the Extractive Sector Activity in Peru, Managed by Centro Ecumnico de Promocin y Accin Social Norte, Cooperative Agreement 72052721CA00007, September 1, 2021, to December 31, 2023
The expansion of benefits under the PACT Act of 2022 necessitated VBA increasing capacity to process the influx of claims. By September 2023, VBA had sought to hire 2,520 claims processors—veterans service representatives and rating veterans service representatives—and reported exceeding its goal by hiring 3,279 claims processors. The OIG conducted this audit to determine whether VBA followed required steps to hire qualified claims processors using PACT Act funds. In addition, the OIG calculated the attrition rates for claims processors and evaluated measures VBA implemented to retain these staff.
The OIG found VBA’s human resources staff generally followed the required steps to hire qualified claims processors using PACT Act funds from October 1, 2022, through September 30, 2023. In just 2 percent of hires, applicants received an official job offer before their screening results were available; nevertheless, rushing official job offers puts VBA at risk of hiring someone who may not be suitable for federal service. Also, although overall time frames were met, the time to onboard—from acceptance of a tentative offer to starting work—exceeded the guidelines.
As for attrition, the OIG determined the median tenure of claims processors who resigned from VBA during the period in question was about 10 to 12 months, just when they have gained proficiency. Consequently, VBA may not recoup the considerable resources invested in recruiting, hiring, and training staff for this critical position. VBA’s Office of Human Capital Services developed a retention program in July 2022, but participation was voluntary and the program also lacked measurable performance indicators, preventing the OIG team from assessing its success.
The OIG made no recommendations as VBA’s existing controls appeared to ensure human resources staff follow the procedures, but the OIG reported ways to improve those procedures and ongoing retention efforts.
In January 2023, the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) issued a record of decision to retire and demolish its Cumberland Fossil Plant and replace one of its two units with a natural gas plant. Subsequently, TVA implemented the Cumberland Energy Solution (CES) project to construct a 1,450-megawatt natural gas-fueled combined cycle (CC) plant. In August 2023, Major Projects obtained approval from the TVA Board of Directors for all related CES project funding (including transmission) totaling $2.1 billion. Due to the importance of completing the transmission modifications to support the CC plant, we initiated an evaluation of the Cumberland CC transmission project. Our evaluation objective was to determine if the project followed TVA’s (1) scope and (2) risk management guidelines.
We determined the Cumberland CC transmission project complied with most elements of scope and risk management. For example, (1) the project had completed required scoping documentation, including a project charter, work breakdown structure, and supporting schedules; (2) funds were appropriately allocated for a change in the project scope; and (3) the risk register contained required elements. However, documentation reflected inadequate collaboration and estimating related to project cost. In addition, risk register development did not adequately include joint project team members and some risk response owners were not aware of their monitoring responsibilities.