An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Department of Education
College of Southern Nevada Complied with Federal Verification and Reporting Requirements
Our audit objectives were to determine whether College of Southern Nevada completed verification of applicant data in accordance with Federal requirements and accurately reported verification results to Federal Student Aid (FSA). The audit covered award year 2016–2017 (July 1, 2016, through June 30, 2017). We found that the College of Southern Nevada completed verification of applicant data in accordance with Federal requirements for all 60 students included in our sample. We also found that the College of Southern Nevada accurately reported verification results to FSA for 57 of the 60 students included in our sample. Although the school did not accurately report verification results for three students, the inaccurate reporting did not affect the amount of Title IV funds disbursed for the students.
The steps the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has taken to address terminated drug utilization in Medicare Part D were not entirely effective and, as a result, CMS continued to accept some prescription drug event (PDE) data for terminated drugs in calendar years (CYs) 2014 and 2015. Although CMS has made improvements to prevent terminated drug utilization in Part D, it accepted PDE data totaling $31.9 million in gross drug costs for 3,705 terminated drugs in CYs 2014 and 2015. CMS did not compare the information on termination dates in its quarterly Medicaid drug rebate files with the Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) file, did not investigate the discrepancies that existed between these two data sources, and did not update its system edits in a timely manner.
Fund Accountability Statement Audit of Locally Incurred Costs by International Research and Exchanges Board (IREX), Partnerships for Youth Program in West Bank and Gaza, Cooperative Agreement AID-294- A-13-00004, January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016
Assurance Engagement on the Fund Accountability Statement of Costas and Rita Severis Foundation, Sharing History, Art, Research, and Education in Cyprus, Cooperative Agreement AID-233-A-13-00001, for the Year Ended December 31, 2014
Assurance Engagement on the Fund Accountability Statement of Costas and Rita Severis Foundation, Sharing History, Art, Research, and Education in Cyprus, Cooperative Agreement AID-233-A-13-00001, for the Year Ended December 31, 2015
What We Looked AtThe Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) employs over 14,000 air traffic controllers to operate 314 air traffic control facilities nationwide. As inefficient facility scheduling can lead to staffing issues and increased overtime costs, in July 2016, FAA and the National Air Traffic Controllers Association (NATCA) agreed to implement a commercially available tool, Operational Planning and Scheduling (OPAS), to standardize scheduling practices at all air traffic facilities. In 2017, the House Appropriations Committee directed OIG to review FAA's progress in implementing a controller scheduling tool and determine whether it is benefiting air traffic managers. Accordingly, our audit objectives were to (1) determine FAA's progress in adopting and implementing a scheduling tool and (2) identify any challenges that will need to be addressed to realize potential benefits.What We FoundAfter 2 years, FAA's air traffic control facilities remain without a standardized scheduling tool. Upon reviewing recommendations from a joint FAA-NATCA workgroup, the Agency decided to use OPAS as a management-only tool, used by managers to create the basic watch schedule, and another system, Air Traffic Operational Management System (ATOMS), to capture the real-time work assignments of air traffic controllers. According to FAA officials, this requires the Agency to modify the scope of OPAS and develop its own daily scheduler, which has extended the project timeline. Thus, FAA remains several years away from deploying a scheduling tool. FAA also faces significant challenges before it can realize the benefits of such a tool. In the 8 years since OPAS was procured for testing purposes at a cost of $17 million, FAA has not established a finalized plan with the dates, system needs, potential risks, and costs of deployment. In addition, FAA's decision to partially implement OPAS and ATOMS increased the level of complexity, and the ATOMS scheduling capability has not been field tested. Training and deployment requirements may change over time. As a result, FAA does not know the final cost or how long it will take to deploy a scheduling tool for the controller workforce.Our RecommendationsWe made two recommendations to help FAA implement a standardized scheduling tool at its air traffic control facilities, and FAA concurred with both recommendations.
This report details the Office of Inspector General's Fall 2018 Semiannual Report to Congress. The following topics are included:Overview of the SBA and the OIGSmall Business Access to CapitalDisaster Loan ProgramProcurement AssistanceAgency ManagementOther Significant OIG ActivitiesStatistical HighlightsAppendices
Office of the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community
Report Description
This is the first semiannual report issued since the U.S. Senate confirmed Michael K. Atkinson as the Inspector General of the Intelligence Community on May 14, 2018. Completed reports issued during the review period pertain to IC Freedom of Information Act programs and ODNI’s payment programs. This report also discusses the establishment of the Center for Protected Disclosures.
Returns on Postal Service retirement investments have declined in recent years. More importantly, Postal Service retirement investments offer only limited protection against higher inflation. Unlike fixed-rate Treasury securities, however, Treasury Inflation-Protected Securities (TIPS) investments increase in step with inflation, thereby countering the effects of higher inflation on underfunded liabilities. Our objective was to determine the impact of investing Postal Service retirement fund assets in TIPS.