An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
U.S. Agency for International Development
Financial Audit of USAID Resources Managed by SIA N'SON NGO in Benin Under Cooperative Agreement 72068020CA00002, January 1 to December 31, 2021
Inadequate Supervision of a Mental Health Provider and Improper Records Management for a Female Patient at the VA Greater Los Angeles Health Care System in California
The VA Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted a healthcare inspection to assess allegations related to the mental health care of a female patient at the VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System (facility) in California, which included that a psychiatry physician resident (psychiatry trainee) was inappropriate during treatment discussions with the patient. The psychiatry trainee utilized a modality called Intensive Short-Term Dynamic Psychotherapy in which a therapist seeks to understand a patient’s interpersonal difficulties, intensify and challenge resistance, analyze transference, explore conflict, and work through unconscious issues.The OIG did not substantiate that the psychiatry trainee’s behavior with the patient was inappropriate. Although the psychiatry trainee did not always engage in effective therapeutic intervention, the OIG was unable to determine that the treatment resulted in a decline in the patient’s mental health causing decreased trust and mental functioning.The OIG found the supervisor did not provide adequate supervision to the psychiatry trainee, to include the psychiatry trainee’s documentation and the supervisor’s documented oversight. The inadequate supervision may have impeded the supervisor’s ability to inform the therapy and hinder the opportunity to achieve a more desirable therapeutic outcome. In addition, the OIG substantiated that Mental Health Department leaders were not responsive to the patient’s concerns. During the inspection, the OIG identified an additional concern regarding the improper creation, storage, and disposition of video recordings and consent forms.The OIG made one recommendation to the Under Secretary for Health to assess the possible scope of current and former VA psychiatry residents being in possession of patients’ personal health information; two recommendations to the Veterans Integrated Service Network Director related to supervision, documentation, document control, and treatment protocols; and three recommendations to the Facility Director related to responses to the patient’s concerns, records, and utilization of video recordings.
United States Attorney’s Office Reaches $639,916 Settlement with Governor of Maryland’s Office on Service and Volunteerism to Resolve Alleged False Claims for AmeriCorps Program Funds
We audited the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) information technology (IT) infrastructure to support mandatory telework. During mandatory telework, more employees simultaneously needed remote access to HUD’s network and agency resources for an extended period, which presented unique risks and security requirements. While HUD is no longer operating under mandatory telework, understanding the challenges it faced is key to managing a flexible workforce and preparing for future emergencies.HUD experienced challenges with its IT infrastructure while under mandatory telework. We found (1) there were significant delays in processing computer security updates, (2) users encountered months of network performance issues, (3) the user password expiration policy was not enforced, and (4) the help desk system did not capture complete data. These conditions occurred because HUD’s virtual private network (VPN) bandwidth was not sufficient to accommodate the significant increase in users’ simultaneously needing remote access and because there were limitations in the technical environment and weaknesses in the help desk system’s controls. As a result, (1) HUD was vulnerable to cyber-attacks and unauthorized access, (2) HUD’s ability to accomplish its mission could be affected, and (3) HUD did not have assurance that all IT problems reported by users were resolved. Although HUD experienced challenges during mandatory telework, HUD continued its operations; increased network capacity; and plans to make additional network improvements, resume password policy enforcement, and potentially replace its help desk system. HUD needs to fully address the underlying causes of the issues identified so that it can manage its flexible workforce in a way that minimizes risk and prepares it for future emergencies.We recommend that HUD’s Office of the Chief Information Officer research, evaluate, and implement technical or alternative solutions to (1) deploy essential computer software updates using secure methods to ensure that computer security updates occur in a timely manner to minimize risk to HUD’s systems and operations; (2) provide additional improvements to VPN-related remote working capabilities, including performing routine VPN stress tests as part of its contingency planning and testing processes; (3) resolve user account management issues; and (4) assess its help desk system against other technical solutions and ensure that the help desk solution used captures complete data on technical support requests. These measures include but are not limited to ensuring that sequence gaps are properly documented or do not occur, valid transactions are accepted by the help desk system, rejected transactions are identified, and the history of each transaction is retained.
In accordance with the GPRA Modernization Act of 2010, the Department’s framework for performance management begins with the Strategic Plan, which serves as the foundation for establishing and implementing priorities, highlighting performance goals and objectives, and developing performance indicators to gauge progress and outcomes. Progress toward the Department’s strategic goals and its two-year Agency Priority Goals (APGs) are measured using data-driven review and analysis.