An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Office of Personnel Management
Audit of Information Systems General and Application Controls at CVS Caremark
Audit of the Information Technology Security Controls of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management's Enterprise Server Infrastructure General Support System FY 2011
We reviewed TVA cost recovery for tritium production under Interagency Agreement DE-A102-00DP00315 with the Department of Energy (DOE). The audit covered the period from January 2000 through December 2009 with some scope restrictions due to incomplete accounting data. We were unable to determine if tritium production costs were accurately identified and invoiced or if any negative impacts on plant operation from tritium production were reimbursed by DOE due to inadequate documentation. Specifically, Nuclear Power Group (NPG) management: (1) had incomplete accounting data, (2) negotiated rates that did not accurately reflect NPG's anticipated costs, (3) did not address $9 million in under-recovered overhead identified in the previous Office of the Inspector General audit on the tritium agreement, (4) did not invoice standby payments and overhead in compliance with agreement terms, (5) did not identify all additional operating costs caused by tritium production, (6) did not have support for $22.9 million in expenses and an unknown amount of revenues, and (7) misclassified revenue. Possible consequences of the audit findings include noncompliance with the Economy Act, noncompliance with the TVA Act resulting in rate-payer subsidy of tritium production, and unreliable NPG financial/performance data.
EAC OIG, through the independent public accounting firm of Clifton Gunderson LLP, audited $144.0 million in funds received by the Pennsylvania Bureau of Commissions, Elections and Legislation under the Help America Vote Act. The objectives of the audit were to determine whether the Bureau (1) used payments authorized by Sections 101, 102, and 251 of HAVA in accordance with HAVA and applicable requirements; (2) accurately and properly accounted for property purchased with HAVA payments and for program income; and (3) met HAVA requirements for Section 251 funds for an election fund and for a matching contribution except for the requirements for maintenance of a base level of state outlays, commonly referred to as Maintenance of Expenditures (MOE).
