An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Department of State, Department of Homeland Security
Washington County, Florida, Effectively Managed FEMA Public Assistance Grant Funds Awarded for a July 2013 Flood
The Office of the Inspector General audited local rate adjustments processed during fiscal year 2015 to determine if TVA's process for reviewing Local Power Company (LPC) rate change requests complied with the approved Revised Rate Review Process (RRRP) in the TVA regulatory policy. We found TVA's process for reviewing LPC rate change requests did not comply with the approved RRRP in the TVA regulatory policy due to improper and unapproved calculations of the Guideline Amount in two areas. We also noted the method used to initially calculate an LPC's cash ratio excluded loans and investments of electric system funds to third parties. We recommended TVA's Vice President, Operational and Regulatory Assurance calculate the Guideline Amount as stated in the RRRP or obtain approval for the current calculation method and include any loans or investments of electric system funds in the initial calculation to determine the LPC's cash ratio.
Although the Kansas Department of Health and Environment, Division of Health Care Finance (State agency) generally complied with Federal Medicaid requirements for invoicing manufacturers for rebates for physician-administered drugs dispensed to enrollees of Medicaid managed-care organizations (MCOs), it did not invoice all rebate-eligible physician-administered drugs dispensed to enrollees of MCOs. Specifically, the State agency did not invoice manufacturers for rebates totaling $63,000 ($36,000 Federal share). These errors occurred because the State agency's internal controls did not always ensure that it invoiced manufacturers to collect rebates.