An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Department of Defense
Audit of Air Force Defective Parts and Contractor Restitution
A Lack of Program Management Controls and Attention to IT Security Threatens the Success of NOAA’s Effort to Implement a Cloud-Based Common Ground System
The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s (NOAA’s) National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service (NESDIS) provides access to global environmental data from satellites and other sources. Current NESDIS ground systems process data from NOAA and non-NOAA satellites and other observing systems. The computing architecture for many of NESDIS’ ground systems is currently located “on premises” rather than in the cloud and was developed with unique designs specific to each mission.NESDIS is transitioning some functionality from its current satellite ground systems to its cloud-based NESDIS Common Cloud Framework (NCCF). The NCCF is intended to provide greater flexibility, efficiency, cybersecurity, and cost effectiveness for the next generation of NESDIS missions.Our audit objective was to assess NESDIS’ progress implementing the NCCF. We found that (1) NESDIS’ effort to implement the NCCF lacks fundamental project management practices set forth in Department of Commerce policy, (2) NOAA is not reporting the NCCF’s financial, project, and performance data to the federal IT dashboard, (3) NESDIS’ penetration testing of the NCCF has been inadequate, and (4) the NCCF is built on a cloud platform that cannot support its security requirements.We made 11 recommendations to help NOAA ensure that the NCCF has appropriate management controls, complies with policy requirements, and meets security requirements.
The VA Office of Inspector General (OIG) Vet Center Inspection Program provides a focused evaluation of aspects of the quality of care delivered throughout Readjustment Counseling Service (RCS).This inspection evaluates four review areas within Continental District 4 including leadership stability, morbidity and mortality reviews, the high risk suicide flag (HRSF) SharePoint site, and safety plans.There were no findings in stability of leadership. Based on active policy at the time of the inspection, the OIG identified that district leaders did not complete timely morbidity and mortality reviews for clients who died by suicide. Inconsistent with requirements at the time, leaders also implemented a peer review process for all suicide attempts instead of the morbidity and mortality reviews. The OIG did not conduct the HRSF SharePoint site review due to concerns with data accuracy. In April 2024, the OIG made a recommendation to the RCS Chief Officer related to HRSF SharePoint site functionality. The recommendation remained open at the time of the inspection; therefore, the OIG will continue to monitor progress to closure and did not make a new recommendation. Vet center staff were noncompliant with completing and providing safety plans to clients.The OIG issued three recommendations for improvement to the District Director.
Based on a preponderance of the evidence, our investigation found that in all four matters, EPA official Joseph Goffman failed to assess whether specific parties or industries posed a potential financial conflict-of-interest prior to participation. Our investigation also found that Goffman held financial interests in the MCM and Commercial sterilization rulemakings and failed to meet his ethical obligations under the federal financial conflicts-of-interest prohibition when he participated in both rulemakings. Our investigation was inconclusive as to whether Goffman met his ethical obligations under the federal financial conflicts-of-interest prohibition when he participated in the review of a request by a corporate entity. Finally, our investigation did not substantiate that Goffman failed to meet his ethical obligations under the federal financial conflicts-of-interest prohibition when he participated in preparations for a "Bipartisan Infrastructure Law and Inflation Reduction Act Roundtable."
Financial Audit of USAID Resources Managed by Lilongwe Diocese Catholic Health Commission in Malawi Under Multiple Awards, October 1, 2022, to September 30, 2023
Financial Audit of USAID Resources Managed by Center for Clinical Care and Clinical Research in Nigeria Under Multiple Awards, October 1, 2022, to September 30, 2023