An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Department of Energy
The Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s Fiscal Year 2025 Financial Statements
This audit was performed by the independent public accounting firm of KPMG LLP (KPMG) on behalf of the Department of Energy Office of Inspector General. KPMG audited the balance sheet of the Department’s Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, as of September 30, 2025, and the related statement of net cost, changes in net position, custodial activity, and statement of budgetary resources for the year then ended.
The audit’s objective was to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements, as a whole, are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditors’ report that included an opinion.
KPMG performed the audit in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards.
KPMG concluded that the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission as of September 30, 2025, and its net cost, changes in net position, custodial activity, and budgetary resources for the year then ended, in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. KPMG also considered the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s internal control over financial reporting as part of their review and did not identify any deficiency in internal control over financial reporting that is considered a material weakness. KPMG tested for compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts, and grant agreements that could have a direct material effect on the financial statements. The results of the auditors’ review disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards, applicable Office of Management and Budget guidance, or the Federal Financial Management Improvement Act of 1996.
There were no formal recommendations for this particular review. As such, there was no formal response required.
DFC is at a pivotal juncture. The Trump administration has established government-wide priorities centered on making America safer, stronger, and more prosperous. To help advance these goals, DFC has been tasked with significant new responsibilities. These responsibilities include partnering with Ukraine on the United States–Ukraine Reconstruction Investment Fund and focusing investments in new sectors, such as nuclear energy technology, artificial intelligence, and drone technology. Further, DFC faces reauthorization and current proposals call for dramatically increasing the Corporation’s contingent liability and expanding the use of equity, among other changes.
In addition to new responsibilities, DFC has experienced leadership turnover. DFC did not have a permanent CEO for most of 2025, 3 and its public sector board members and politically appointed leadership are new to DFC. DFC also experienced a 25 percent workforce reduction with many employees retiring or taking the administration’s deferred resignation program. Thus, the Corporation must position itself to take on new responsibilities and prioritize investments in new sectors with fewer staff. This year’s Top Management Challenges identifies three key items DFC should consider: (1) Updating the Strategic Plan Due to Changes in Priorities and Leadership; (2) Developing a Strategic Workforce Plan; and (3) Streamlining the Origination Process. Addressing these challenges will help DFC achieve its mission.
This Office of Inspector General (OIG) Healthcare Facility Inspection program report describes the results of a focused evaluation of the care provided at the Miami VA Healthcare System in Florida.
This evaluation focused on five key content domains: • Culture • Environment of care • Patient safety • Primary care • Veteran-centered safety net
The OIG issued five recommendations for VA to correct identified deficiencies in one domain: 1. Environment of care • Address environment of care deficiencies • Preventive maintenance for medical equipment • Supply storage • Expired medical supplies and patient food • Door signs
The Minority Business Development Agency’s (MBDA’s) Business Center program is a network of centers supporting minority business enterprises that are funded through cooperative agreements with private-sector entities, state entities, native entities, and institutes of higher education. MBDA has an oversight role to ensure that Business Centers meet the terms and conditions of their cooperative agreements and report accomplishments in a consistent, accurate manner.
We conducted this audit to follow up on a 2017 audit that found issues with how MBDA administers the Business Center program. The objective for this audit was to determine the adequacy of MBDA’s oversight of the MBDA Business Center program to ensure requirements are met.
We found significant issues with MBDA’s oversight and monitoring of its Business Center program, similar to our 2017 audit. Specifically, we found that MBDA did not (1) sufficiently monitor Business Center activities for compliance with award requirements, (2) ensure performance metrics reported by Business Centers were accurate and reliable, (3) address Business Center single audit findings, and (4) perform required Business Center site inspections. Consequently, MBDA cannot ensure that Business Centers comply with award terms and conditions. Further, MBDA cannot ensure that Business Center program goals are being met.
We recommended that MBDA consider improvements to monitoring and oversight when finalizing its plan for continuing operations as it implements Executive Order 14238.
This Office of Inspector General (OIG) Healthcare Facility Inspection program report describes the results of a focused evaluation of the care provided at the VA Tennessee Valley Healthcare System in Nashville.
This evaluation focused on five key content domains: • Culture • Environment of care • Patient safety • Primary care • Veteran-centered safety net
The OIG issued two recommendations for VA to correct identified deficiencies in one domain: 1. Environment of care • Preventive maintenance • Permanent biomedical engineering chief and repeat environment of care findings
This Office of Inspector General (OIG) Healthcare Facility Inspection program report describes the results of a focused evaluation of the care provided at the Minneapolis VA Health Care System in Minnesota.
This evaluation focused on five key content domains: • Culture • Environment of care • Patient safety • Primary care • Veteran-centered safety net
The OIG issued three recommendations for VA to correct identified deficiencies in one domain: 1. Environment of care • Feminine hygiene products • Secure medications • Equipment inspection dates
The Inspector General’s Assessment of the Most Serious Management and Performance Challenges Facing the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board in Fiscal Year 2026
Financial Audit of USAID Resources Managed by Organization for Public Health Interventions and Development in Zimbabwe Under Multiple Awards, October 1, 2023, to September 30, 2024