An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Department of Homeland Security
Conditions at CBP's Forward Operating Bases along the Southwest Border (Redacted)
CNCS-OIG investigators found that a Nevada Commission employee violated the Commission's conflict of interest policy when the employee received a small item from an AmeriCorps subgrantee for his personal business.
This report provides the results of our most recent audit of the efforts that the First Responder Network Authority (FirstNet) has taken to include federal government needs and requirements into the planning of the nationwide public safety broadband network (NPSBN). Specifically, we assessed FirstNet’s effectiveness regarding (1) informing federal agencies about FirstNet and the NPSBN and (2) soliciting and addressing federal agency concerns.
OIG administers the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit (MFCU or Unit) grant awards, annually recertifies the Units, and oversees the Units' performance in accordance with the requirements of the grant. As part of this oversight, OIG conducts periodic reviews of all Units and prepares public reports based on these reviews. The reviews assess the Units' performance in accordance with the 12 MFCU performance standards and their compliance with applicable Federal requirements.
HPM Foundation, Inc. (HPM), operating in San Juan, Puerto Rico, did not comply with all applicable Federal requirements and grant terms related to its Affordable Care Act-funded capital development grant. Specifically, HPM claimed unallowable construction consulting costs totaling $35,000. In addition, HPM did not (1) comply with procurement standards, (2) separately account for grant funds, (3) properly maintain and track equipment purchased with grant funds, and (4) provide the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) reliable data on the number of patients served.
