Federal Reports

To view this interactive report, visit: https://oig.justice.gov/reports/concurrent-inspections-bop-food-service-operations

The Office of Inspector General is issuing this inspection report to assess the U.S. Small Business Administration’s (SBA) initial response to Hurricane Helene, including staffing, loan application volume, and timeliness of disaster loan approvals.

We found that in SBA’s initial disaster assistance response to Hurricane Helene, the agency promptly established a field presence, adequately staffed recovery centers, responded timely to applicant queries, and processed loans in a timely manner.

We found that SBA processed loan applications in 20 days on average but was unable to disburse many of those loans due to a 68-day funding lapse. As a result, the overall processing time was 69 days on average with the funding lapse and 64 days on average without it. In addition, we identified opportunities for SBA to optimize its outreach efforts so disaster survivors are aware of the assistance available to them.

We recommended SBA review current outreach strategies; immediately conduct outreach efforts in North Carolina and South Carolina and perform a root cause analysis to determine the basis of insufficient outreach efforts in these two states; and implement appropriate changes to ensure maximum awareness of available assistance to disaster survivors that account for rural areas.

Management’s planned actions to review staffing assignments to ensure adequate coverage for future disasters and immediately conduct outreach efforts in North Carolina and South Carolina resolved Recommendations 1 and 2. Management’s response did not resolve Recommendation 3; therefore, we will seek resolution in accordance with our audit follow-up policy.

The Office of the Inspector General conducted an audit of TVA’s cloud inventory due to the Tennessee Valley Authority’s (TVA) increased use of cloud services.  Our objective was to determine if TVA maintained an accurate and complete cloud inventory.  Although we determined TVA’s (1) defined processes related to managing cloud inventory were designed in alignment with identified best practices, and (2) access controls for the cloud inventory were operating effectively, TVA does not maintain an accurate and complete cloud inventory.  Specifically, (1) cloud services procured outside of the IT organization’s procurement process were not included in inventory, (2) reconciliation controls did not include all available sources to identify cloud services, and (3) required fields in existing inventory data were incomplete. 

This report, specifically identifies Center for Internet Security, a nongovernmental organization/business entity.  Pursuant to the James M. Inhofe National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2023, Pub. L. No. 117-263 §5274, any such organization may submit a written response to the report within 30 days, clarifying or providing additional context for each instance within the report in which the organization is specifically identified.  Any response provided for that purpose will be appended to the final, published report.  If you have any questions about this process, please contact Jeffrey McKenzie at (865) 633-7374 or jtmckenzie@tvaoig.gov within 30 days of publication.

The GPO OIG Investigations Division investigated GPO-issued cell phones, comparing application data against GPO policy, particularly Section 7, Subsection C, paragraphs 6 and 14 of GPO Directive 825.29E on Internet and Email Policy.

Why We Did This Report

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Inspector General conducted this audit to determine the extent to which the EPA prioritizes and awards Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act funds to tribes through the Clean Water Indian Set-Aside Grant Program and the Drinking Water Infrastructure Grants—Tribal Set-Aside Program, in accordance with applicable statutes, regulations, and EPA guidance.

Summary of Findings

The EPA’s Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, or IIJA, funds for the Clean Water Indian Set-Aside, or CWISA, Program and the Drinking Water Infrastructure Grants—Tribal Set-Aside, or DWIG-TSA, Program, collectively referred to as the tribal set-aside programs, were not awarded in a timely manner. About $86.3 million, or roughly 57 percent, of the $152.1 million allocated in fiscal year 2022 IIJA tribal set-aside funds were not awarded to tribes in a timely manner. At the time of our data collection, about $125.3 million, or roughly 76 percent, of the $164.1 million allocated in FY 2023 IIJA tribal set-aside funds had not been awarded to tribes.

As of December 2023, about $140.6 million, or roughly 93 percent, of $152.0 million of the FYs 2022 and 2023 DWIG-TSA funds allocated for emerging contaminants and lead service line replacements had not been awarded to tribal projects.

This report presents the results of our audit of the Effectiveness of the New Regional Processing and Distribution Center in Boise, ID.

As part of its Delivering for America plan, the U.S. Postal Service plans to create a modernized network based around Regional Processing and Distribution Centers (RPDC), local processing centers and sorting and delivery centers. RPDCs merge mail processing into a central facility within a region to reduce transportation and improve service reliability. In July 2023, the Postal Service began consolidating operations into the Boise facility and in October 2024, officially recognized it as the fifth RPDC in its network. Efficient and effective RPDCs are critical to the success of the Postal Service’s Delivering for America plan and its goal of being financially self-sustaining.

The objective of this audit was to assess the operational impacts related to the launch of the RPDC and identify successes, opportunities, and lessons learned. We conducted observations of the Boise, ID, RPDC and analyzed supporting data.

Amtrak (the company) contracted with the independent public accounting firm of Ernst & Young LLP to audit its consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year then ended, September 30, 2024, and to provide a report on internal control over financial reporting and compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements, and other matters, which they issued on December 12, 2024.1 Because the company receives federal financial assistance, it must obtain an audit performed in accordance with U.S. generally accepted government auditing standards.

The contract also required Ernst & Young to perform a Single Audit of the company’s federal financial assistance for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024, in accordance with the audit requirements of 2 C.F.R. 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance). The objective of the Single Audit was to test internal control over compliance with major federal program award requirements and determine whether the company complied with the laws, regulations, and provisions of contracts or grant agreements that may have a direct and material effect on its major federal programs.

As required by the Inspector General Act of 1978, we monitored the audit activities of Ernst & Young to help ensure audit quality and compliance with auditing standards. Our review disclosed no instances in which Ernst & Young did not comply, in all material respects, with U.S. generally accepted government auditing standards and Uniform Guidance requirements.