Federal Reports

Our objective was to evaluate the efficiency and effectiveness of the Surface Transfer Centers in the Western Pacific Region. To accomplish our objective, we reviewed key performance indicators associated with the transfer centers and conducted site visits at the transfer centers in Southern California, Northern California, and Salt Lake City.

Our objective was to evaluate the Postal Service’s performance during the FY 2023 peak mailing season and the implementation of its peak season preparedness plan. We also conducted fieldwork at the Athens S&DC and the Brooklyn PDC to determine if the new facilities had an impact on peak season operations.

We investigated allegations that a retired USPP Sergeant violated ethics regulations by seeking employment with a company while overseeing its work.

Keith Kovaleski, a former Amtrak Assistant Foreman, based in New York, was sentenced to 10 months’ home confinement in U.S District Court, District of New Jersey, on July 12, 2023, for marketing and distributing over $3 million worth of misbranded and unapproved new drugs. On July 11, 2023, his spouse, Sylvia Kovaleski, was also sentenced for her involvement in the scheme to 3 years’ probation. The couple was ordered to forfeit over $3 million as restitution. They pleaded guilty to the charges in March 2022.

What We Looked AtWe performed a quality control review (QCR) on the single audit that Eide Bailly LLP performed for the Riverside County Transportation Commission’s (RCTC) fiscal year that ended June 30, 2021. During this period, RCTC expended approximately $626.8 million from U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) programs. Eide Bailly determined that DOT’s major programs were the Federal Transit Administration’s Federal Transit Cluster and the Federal Highway Administration’s Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act Program. Our QCR objectives were to determine whether (1) the audit work complied with the Single Audit Act of 1984, as amended, the Office of Management and Budget’s Uniform Guidance, and the extent to which we could rely on the auditor’s work on DOT’s major programs and (2) RCTC’s reporting package complied with the reporting requirements of the Uniform Guidance. What We FoundEide Bailly complied with the requirements of the Single Audit Act, the Uniform Guidance, and DOT’s major programs. We found nothing to indicate that Eide Bailly’s opinion on DOT’s major programs was inappropriate or unreliable. In addition, we did not identify deficiencies in RCTC’s reporting package that required correction and resubmission.