An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
U.S. Agency for International Development
Financial Audit of the Merit and Need-Based Scholarship Program Phase-11 in Pakistan Managed by the Higher Education Commission, Grant 391-G-00-04-01023-12, July 1, 2017, to June 30, 2018
Financial Audit of the Gomal Zam Dam Command Area Development Project in Pakistan Managed by the Government of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Agriculture, Livestock, and Cooperatives Department, Grant 391-DOA-GZDCADP-001-001, July 1, 2017, to June 30, 2018
Financial Audit of the Power Transmission System for Wind Projects in Sindh Wind Corridor Managed by National Transmission and Despatch Company Limited, Grant 391-PEPA-ENR-WTL-00, for the Year Ended June 30, 2018
Closeout Audit of Gender Equality Program Managed by Aurat Publication and Information Service Foundation in Pakistan, Cooperative Agreement AID-391-A-00-10-01162-00, July 1, 2016, to August 15, 2017
Financial Audit of USAID Resources Managed by Ghana Institute of Management and Public Administration in Multiple Countries Under Agreement AID-624-A-15-00009, January 1 to December 31, 2018
Audit of the Justice Management Division’s Personnel Accountability and Assessment System Pursuant to the Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014 Fiscal Year 2019
Audit of the Justice Management Division’s Information Security Program Pursuant to the Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014 Fiscal Year 2019
Manipulation of Radiology Reports and Leadership Failures in the Medical Imaging Service at Clement J. Zablocki VA Medical Center in Milwaukee, Wisconsin
The VA Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted a healthcare inspection regarding allegations that a radiologist made gross errors resulting in treatment delays and placed misleading report addenda in records, and that leaders were tolerant of this practice. During the inspection, the OIG found evidence of manipulation and vulnerability of the electronic health record and mismanagement of the Medical Imaging Service. Facility leaders failed to successfully manage or address the impact of interpersonal conflicts within the Medical Imaging Service that included intimidation of staff radiologists. The OIG was concerned that ongoing interpersonal conflicts, coupled with the lack of defined plans for resolution, had the potential to adversely affect patient care. The OIG did not substantiate that the radiologist made addenda to cover gross errors resulting in treatment delays that contributed to adverse clinical outcomes for two patients or that the radiologist’s use of addenda was misleading. However, the date and location of addenda in radiology reports may hinder transparent communication of clinical information. Both Veterans Integrated Service Network and facility leaders failed to conduct a thorough and impartial review related to the OIG request to evaluate the original allegations. The OIG made eight recommendations including two addressed to the Under Secretary for Health regarding addenda, deletion, and formatting features for radiology reports in the new electronic health record, and an evaluation of the circumstances that led to the radiology manager’s deletion of an imaging report. Two recommendations to the Veterans Integrated Service Network 12 Director related to imaging archiving and communication system practices and oversight of OIG hotline case referrals. Four recommendations for the Facility Director focused on correction of the patient’s imaging study, Medical Imaging Service oversight and management, evaluation of Medical Imaging Service’s workplace culture, and evaluation of the need for workplace intimidation training and the process for reporting concerns.