An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Department of Veterans Affairs
Comprehensive Healthcare Inspection of the Central Alabama Veterans Health Care System in Montgomery
This Office of Inspector General (OIG) Comprehensive Healthcare Inspection Program report describes the results of a focused evaluation of the quality of care delivered in the inpatient and outpatient settings of the Central Alabama Veterans Health Care System, which includes the Central Alabama VA Medical Center-Montgomery, Central Alabama VA Medical Center-Tuskegee, and multiple outpatient clinics in Alabama and Georgia. This evaluation focused on five key operational areas:• Leadership and organizational risks• Quality, safety, and value• Medical staff privileging• Environment of care• Mental health (suicide prevention initiatives)The OIG issued two recommendations for improvement in the mental health area of review:• Comprehensive Suicide Risk Evaluation completion• Suicide-related event reporting
An annual update on the OIG’s oversight of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s implementation of the IIJA, which appropriates over $60 billion to the EPA for fiscal years 2022 through 2026, representing the largest appropriation that the Agency has ever received.
The VA Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted a healthcare inspection to assess allegations related to deficiencies in the communication with and care coordination for a post-stroke patient who died by suicide at the VA Maine Healthcare System (facility) outpatient clinic in Augusta, Maine. Although the OIG identified deficiencies in the quality of care and completion of quality reviews, the OIG was unable to determine whether a change in care would have resulted in a different outcome for the patient.After the patient had a stroke, facility staff communicated with the patient and scheduled a primary care appointment. However, following the patient’s suicidal statements, facility staff were unable to engage the patient to complete a formal suicide risk screening and did not document the inability to complete the screening per Veterans Health Administration policy or ensure a safety plan was in place. Furthermore, a staff member did not follow the facility policy of notifying suicide prevention staff to garner support for the patient.A primary care provider failed to assess the patient for post-stroke depression, conduct a neurological assessment to determine cognitive or neurological impairments, or consider all options for rehabilitation services and transportation to outpatient therapy.The OIG identified deficiencies with facility quality management reviews. The root cause analysis team did not follow the required process for facility leaders’ nonconcurrence with root cause analysis findings. Additionally, facility leaders did not recognize the need to conduct a peer review of the primary care provider as required by VHA policy.The OIG made seven recommendations to the Facility Director related to suicide screening, safety plans, suicide prevention staff engagement, root cause analyses, peer reviews, and quality management reviews.
We included an audit of the Tennessee Valley Authority’s (TVA) management of early payment discounts on vendor invoices in our annual audit plan as a follow up to audit 2017-15500, Early Payment Discounts on Vendor Invoices, dated May 30, 2018, where we reported TVA missed 19 percent of all early payment discount opportunities. Our audit objective was to determine if early payment discounts are appropriately managed by TVA. Our audit scope included invoices from Supply Chain contracts and purchase orders with greater than $1 million in spend in any one fiscal year from October 1, 2020, through September 30, 2023.We found TVA’s management of early payment discounts could be improved as 18 percent of all available discounts, totaling $826,252, were not taken during the audit period. Based on our analysis and interviews with relevant personnel, we determined some personnel were often unaware of important aspects of how to manage (1) early payment discount terms, (2) invoices sent by vendors after the discount period expired, and (3) invoices sent by vendors before materials are received. Additionally, we noted TVA Supply Chain maintains dashboards that could be used to help management identify training needs.