Federal Reports

Why We Did This Report

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Inspector General conducted this evaluation to determine whether the EPA implemented effective controls during the selection of Track I grant awardees through the Community Change Grants Program within the EPA Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights.
 

Summary of Findings

The EPA implemented effective controls during its review and selection of Track I Community Change Grants Program applications. The EPA adhered to its Policy for Competition of Assistance Agreements and other applicable requirements during the application review process. Additionally, the EPA ensured that Track I grant awardees met the eligibility requirements stated in the Inflation Reduction Act.

The audit objectives were to determine whether program funds were managed in accordance with the ARC and Federal grant requirements.

The Office of Inspector General engaged the independent public accounting firm of KPMG LLP (KPMG) to conduct the fiscal year 2025 financial statements audit of the Western Area Power Administration (WAPA), subject to our review. As part of this audit, KPMG considered WAPA’s internal controls over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances for the purpose of expressing its opinion on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of WAPA’s internal control.

KPMG performed the audit in accordance with generally accepted government auditing standards.

During the audit, KPMG identified certain deficiencies in WAPA’s internal control related to the recording of operation and maintenance expenses, purchased power expense, and accounts payable that are included in the management letter. 

The management letter contains two findings and five recommendations that were issued to WAPA during The Western Area Power Administration’s Fiscal Year 2025 Financial Statements Audit. Management concurred with the findings and recommendations and had taken or planned to take corrective actions. Management’s responses are included with each finding.