An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Department of Defense
Audit of DoD Actions Taken to Implement Cybersecurity Protections Over Remote Access Software in the Coronavirus Disease–2019 Telework Environment
Our objective was to determine whether costs incurred by the Postal Service, as they relate to contractor employee labor qualifications for paid invoices, conform to contract requirements. For our audit work, we randomly selected and reviewed 92 time and materials invoices from FY 2021. We tested to determine if labor categories upheld contractual terms, employees’ experience complied with the proposed labor categories, labor billing rates aligned with contractual terms, and the Postal Service approved excess hours worked.
Audit of the Schedule of Expenditures of Middle East Education Through Technology, Northern Innovators Program in West Bank and Gaza, Cooperative Agreement 294-20-CA-0001, June 26, 2020 to December 31, 2021.
Close-out Audit of the Schedule of Expenditures of Bidaya Corporate Communications, Outreach and Communication Services Project in Jordan, contract AID-278-C-17-00002, January 1, 2021, to July 31, 2022
Financial Audit of MCC Resources Managed by Millennium Challenge Account Niger, Under the Compact Agreement Between MCC and the Government of Niger, October 1, 2020 to March 31, 2021
An Amtrak electrical journeyman, based in Washington, D.C., signed a civil settlement agreement on March 23, 2023, with the U.S. Attorney’s Office, Southern District of Florida, and agreed to pay $23,360 in restitution and a $5,640 penalty. Our investigation found that the employee submitted an application containing false statements and information to a lender backed by the Small Business Administration to qualify for a Payroll Protection Program loan. As a result, the employee received $20,800 in federal CARES Act funds to which she was not entitled.