An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Department of Homeland Security
CBP Complied with Facial Recognition Policies to Identify International Travelers at Airports
Our objective was to determine to what extent CBP adheres to its policies and procedures for resolving facial biometric discrepancies when confirming travelers’ identities at airports.
The objective was to determine the extent to which DHS is positioned to prevent and reduce domestic terrorism in the United States. We determined that DHS has taken steps to help the United States counter terrorism, but those efforts have not always been consistent.
Our objective was to assess the Postal Service’s justification for and use of funds received under the CARES Act, as amended by the Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2021, and associated disclosure requirements.
For our final report on our audit of the U.S. Department of Commerce’s (the Department’s) Business Applications Solution program (the Program), our objective was to assess the Department’s management and implementation of the Program. To meet our objective, we determined the extent to which the Program implemented four selected best practice areas—business process reengineering, requirements management, program monitoring, and risk management—and identified opportunities for improvement. We found the following: I. the Program continues to lack a sound business process reengineering plan; II. the Program should address weaknesses in its requirements management plans and processes; and III. the Program should enhance its risk management practices.
Findings of Misconduct by a then Special Agent in Charge and two Assistant Special Agents in Charge for Engaging in Favoritism in the Workplace, Multiple Violations of Hiring Policies, and Related Misconduct