An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Department of Health & Human Services
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Met Many Requirements of the Improper Payments Information Act of 2002 but Did Not Fully Comply for Fiscal Year 2019
The Office of Inspector General (OIG) must review the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) compliance with the Improper Payments Information Act of 2002 (IPIA; P.L. No. 107-300) as amended by the Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Act of 2010 (P.L. No. 111-204) and the Improper Payments Elimination and Recovery Improvement Act of 2012 (IPERIA; P.L. No. 112-248). Ernst & Young LLP (E&Y), under its contract with the OIG, audited the fiscal year 2019 HHS improper payment information reported in the Agency Financial Report (AFR) to determine compliance with IPIA and related guidance from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
The National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) Office of Inspector General's Semiannual Report to the NCUA Board and the Congress highlighting our accomplishments and ongoing work for the 6-month period ending March 31, 2020.
Examination of Ta'awon Palestinian Conflict Resolution Institute's Compliance with AID-294-F-16-00001, Partnership for Social Accountability Program in West Bank and Gaza, July 1, 2017 to June 30, 2018
Examination of Costs Claimed for Tetra Tech ES, Inc. for Each of the Three Fiscal Years Ended October 2, 2011; September 30, 2012; and September 29, 2013
The Transportation Security Administration (TSA) cannot show deployment and use of its Passenger Screening Canine (PSC) teams provide effective security at passenger screening checkpoints. Specifically, TSA: has not determined the number of teams needed to provide security and mitigate risks because it does not identify and document mission needs, capability gaps, and operational goals for deploying the teams; may not be allocating PSC teams to the highest risk airports because it does not properly justify and document allocation decisions, has not determined whether the limited use of PSC teams provides sufficient security because it cannot justify the teams as the best, most cost-effective checkpoint security; and cannot be assured airports are using PSC teams properly because it does not adequately oversee TSA management operations at airports.
