Investigative Reports

A compliance review discovered that grantee Mid-Delta Community Consortium (MDCC), West Helena, AR, assigned AmeriCorps members a variety of tasks that were beyond the scope of its grant from the Arkansas Service Commission.

Acting on a Hotline complaint, CNCS-OIG investigators determined that VISTA participants at Community in Schools of Hernando County (CIS-Hernando), Brooksville, FL, were assigned direct service tasks beyond the scope of the grant, and displaced employees by performing staff functions.

This Newsletter provides a bimonthly summary of selected investigative accomplishments.

CNCS management asked CNCS-OIG to investigate an AmeriCorps member serving at the Nevada Clean Energy Corps, Carson City, NV, who was suspended after a completed criminal history check revealed him to be a registered sex offender.

In early 2015, a confidential complainant contacted OIG alleging potential policy and regulatory violations taking place in the office of a high-ranking political appointee. The evidence developed over the course of inquiry established that a variety of problems arose in the appointee's office during the appointee's tenure with the Department.

OIG's comprehensive analysis focused on two overlapping periods: a 9-month period (8.6 million hours) and a 15-month period (14.6 million hours). The 1-year average of unsupported time amounted to nearly 180,000 unsupported hours. However, the total unsupported hours over the 9- and 15-month periods could be twice as high as reported in this investigation.

A joint investigation with PennSERVE: The Governor’s Office of Citizen Service, Harrisburg, PA, found that Communities in Schools of Pennsylvania (CISPA), Harrisburg, PA, failed to conduct critical criminal history checks (CHCs) and falsely certified to CNCS that it was in compliance with all CHC requirements during a Corporation-wide assessment and amnesty.

The Government Charge Card Abuse Prevention Act of 2012 (Public Law 112-194) requires Offices of Inspector General to, among other things, conduct periodic assessments of the government purchase card program to identify and analyze risks of illegal, improper, or erroneous purchases and payments. According to Office of Management and Budget memorandum M-13-21, this risk assessment should be performed annually. The purpose of this memorandum is to fulfill the requirements of the Act and OMB guidance. Generally, we found that PBGC has policies and procedures in place to address the requirements in the Act, and has internal controls to assist in the monitoring of this program. Based on our review, we determined that the risk of illegal, improper, or erroneous purchases is low.

Alerted to allegations that Senior Corps grantee Great Lake Inter-Tribal Council, Lac du Flambeau, WI, misused program funds, CNCS-OIG investigators conducted a review in conjunction with an agency grant officer and a program officer. This joint review found that the grantee had abused the funds awarded by CNCS in multiple ways.

We received a complaint from a former pension benefits supervisor (Complainant) of a PBGC contractor (Contractor) who claimed she was terminated in October 2014, in retaliation for making protected disclosure of certain information, in violation of 41 U.S.C. § 4712, (Pilot Program for Enhancement of Contractor Protection from Reprisal for Disclosure of Certain Information). The Contractor operates one of PBGC’s Field Benefit Administration services offices which provide participant and benefit processing services and assistance.Based on information received from the Complainant, we identified six separate disclosures. We concluded that four of her disclosures were not “protected” disclosures as defined by the statute. We concluded two disclosures about the Contractor’s alleged failure to pay her overtime could reasonably be considered protected as defined by the statute. However, we were unable to show that the Contractor official who terminated the Complainant knew of these disclosures. Even if the evidence were to show that the Complainant’s disclosures were a contributing factor in her termination, we found there is reasonable grounds to conclude that the Contractor can show by clear and convincing evidence that the Contractor official would have terminated her on other grounds absent her disclosures. In sum, we concluded there is insufficient evidence to substantiate the Complainant’s allegation that the Contractor subjected the Complainant to a reprisal for whistleblowing.Because the final report contains information protected by the Privacy Act of 1974, disclosure of the report is restricted.

An AmeriCorps member reported allegations that a New Mexico AmeriCorps grantee required members to engage in prohibited activities by participating in a syringe exchange program.

A grantee reported an AmeriCorps member serving as a tutor for suspected prohibited activity.