Federal Reports

We performed four agreed-upon procedures, which were requested solely to assist management in determining the validity of the Winning Performance payout awards for the year ended September 30, 2006.In summary, we found:Seven instances where adjustments to the fiscal year 2006 goals were not properly approved. Four of the adjustments required TVA Board approval. Two of these adjustments will result in no payout and related to the Environmental Impact indicator on the TVA scorecard. In three of the four adjustments requiring Board approval, evidence was provided which showed a Board member informally approved the adjustment.Actual year-to-date inputs for each indicator agreed with the respective "reason for improvement" sheet. Actual inputs for the eight TVA-wide metrics agreed with the underlying support provided by the Strategic Business Units, with one exception which related to a miscalculation of the Productivity indicator. This one exception will not affect the payout. In addition, we noted actual performance for the Asset Availability indicator was not rounded consistently with that of other indicators, which will affect the payout. We were informed that the actual amount was truncated with the Chief Executive Officer’s approval, rather than rounded. We further noted no formal policy was in place to guide rounding decisions. The payout percentages were recalculated without exception. However, it should be noted that two indicators at Colbert and John Sevier were included in the calculations at target rather than actual. Summary Only

In accordance with our annual plan, the United States Capitol Police (USCP or the Department) Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted an audit of the Department’s financial statements for the years ended September 30, 2005, and 2004. Our objective was to express an opinion on the fairness of the financial statements in all material respects and render an opinion on controls over financial reporting and report on compliance with laws, regulations, and contracts. Our audit was conducted in accordance with Government Auditing Standards.

October 25, 2006 - Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant (BFN) Materials Inventory Accounting Practices - 2006-530IAt the request of the TVA’s Chief Nuclear Officer and Executive Vice President, we conducted a review of inventory accounting practices at Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant. Specifically, we were requested to determine whether (1) proper accounting practices and TVA policies were followed when returning material and components (i.e., spare parts) to inventory after being removed from installed locations and (2) existing procedures provide adequate guidance on returning spare parts to inventory. In summary, we found:Noncompliance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and TVA policies and procedures.TVA policies and procedures do not adequately address (a) how to account for the return of material/components to inventory from installed locations (i.e., spare parts) and (b) the inventory tracking of spare parts.While we found no indication of intent to manipulate the entries to achieve outage performance goals, the circumstances could create an appearance to do so.TVA management agreed with our findings and has initiated or plans to initiate corrective action.