An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
U.S. African Development Foundation
Audit of U.S. African Development Foundation Activities in Turkana
The U.S. Postal Service has an opportunity to generate additional revenue by offering micro-warehousing and other logistics support services. Its extensive processing, retail, and transportation network – combined with its significant shipping capabilities – could likely meet customers’ demands for one-stop micro-warehousing and logistics solutions to support e-commerce. Foreign suppliers selling goods in the U.S. via e-commerce could be particularly well served by the Postal Service’s entry into this market.
At the request of the Chief of Police. the Office of Inspector General (OIG) conducted a performance audit of the United States Capitol Police (USCP or Department) controls over ammunition.The objectives of our audit were to determine: (1)effectiveness of USCP's internal controls over ammunition and ensure accountability of those sensitive items; (2) whether USCP complied with applicable policies and procedures, laws, and regulations; and (3) whether USCP inventory records reconciled to actual ammunition on hand and official inventory records. Our scope included controls, processes, and operations in place from October 1, 2011, through September 30, 2013.
In response to Congressional requests and media reports about whether the terms and conditions of the debit cards that servicers use to deliver Title IV credit balances to students were in the best interest of students, we conducted a review that determined that FSA should take action to better ensure that student interests are served. Among our findings, we noted that (1) Schools that outsourced credit balance delivery gave servicers significant control over the Title IV funds delivery process and relied on them to comply with Title IV regulations but did not routinely monitor servicers’ Title IV compliance or their handling of student complaints; (2) Schools had financial incentives in their contracts with servicers that created the potential for conflicts of interest that could influence school officials’ decisions and actions at the expense of student interests; and (3) Schools provided, or servicers collected, student information that was not needed to deliver credit balances.