An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Social Security Administration
Development and Implementation of the Debt Management Product
Objective: To determine whether the Social Security Administration developed the Debt Management Product in accordance with Federal best practices and met its project cost and schedule estimates.
Objective: To determine whether Social Security Administration employees properly processed representative payee applications in the Electronic Representative Payee System.
Objective: To determine whether the Social Security Administration was managing its Security Assessment and Authorization process in accordance with Federal and Agency requirements.
Objective: To determine whether the Social Security Administration acted in accordance with its policies and procedures when it processed Supplemental Security Income ineligibility determinations and suspensions based on applicants’, recipients’, or representative payees’ failure to provide information.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology’s (NIST’s) Hollings Manufacturing Extension Partnership (MEP) is a national network of 51 MEP Centers—in all 50 states and Puerto Rico—providing any U.S. manufacturer with resources to improve production processes, upgrade technological capabilities, and facilitate product innovation. The MEP mission is to enhance the productivity and technological performance of U.S. manufacturing.NIST makes federal financial assistance awards in the form of cooperative agreements to state, university, and nonprofit organizations to operate Centers. However, renewal funding for each Center is contingent, in part, upon successful reviews and evaluations of its operations, including its performance. NIST principally monitors MEP’s performance through economic impact surveys completed by a Center’s clients. The intent of the survey is to capture quantified impacts on a client’s employment, sales, investment, and cost savings that occurred over the last 12 months, as a result of the services received.NIST uses economic impacts from survey responses not only to monitor Center performance but also to gauge MEP’s overall success. NIST reports MEP’s economic impacts publicly in various ways, including to Congress, which uses the information to make annual funding decisions regarding MEP appropriations.Our evaluation objective was to determine whether NIST’s MEP effectively monitored and evaluated economic impact reporting. We found that NIST’s inadequate oversight of the MEP economic impact reporting process resulted in inaccurate and unreliable economic impacts. Specifically, we found that (1) MEP’s FY 2022 economic impacts are unreliable, including 48 percent of the total sales reported by Centers we reviewed, (2) NIST overstated MEP’s return on investment from FYs 2020 to 2023—notably by 34 percent in FY 2020, and (3) Centers require clients to take MEP surveys, contrary to federal directive. We also reported another matter related to Centers not accurately reporting program income earned—raising concerns about compliance with award terms and conditions.We made eight recommendations to help NIST ensure accountability and data reliability in its reporting of MEP’s economic impacts.
The U.S. International Development Finance Corporation (DFC) Office of Inspector General (OIG) contracted with the independent public accounting firm RMA Associates, LLC (RMA) to conduct the Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014 (FISMA) audit of DF) for FY 2024 to evaluate the effectiveness of the DFC's information security program and practices, and determine what maturity level DFC achieved for each of the core metrics and supplemental metrics outlined in the FY 2023 - 2024 Inspectors General (IG) FISMA Reporting Metrics. Our objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness of the DFC's information security program and practices and determine the maturity level DFC achieved for each of the core metrics and supplemental metrics outlined in the FY 2023 - 2024 IG FISMA Reporting Metrics.
VA’s Veterans Transportation Program offers travel solutions for veterans to get to and from VA healthcare facilities at little or no cost to veterans. One travel option is transportation by wheelchair van. VA’s Health Administration Service is responsible for administering the contracts that provide wheelchair-accessible transportation services for veterans to access VA medical facilities in the healthcare system.The OIG conducted this review because of a hotline referral that alleged mismanagement of contracts for wheelchair transportation services at the Dallas VA Medical Center in VA’s North Texas Health Care System. The OIG substantiated the allegation that Health Administration Service officials mismanaged the contracts and found that staff overpaid the contractor approximately 30 percent, or $3.7 million, for mileage overcharges and duplicate invoices. Certifying officials did not verify invoices and relied on program assistants to approve or deny invoices for certification. In addition, a manager who plays a key role in the program’s operations did not ensure staff followed VA’s financial policy for reviewing and certifying invoices or provide certifying officials with the current contract rates or a standard operating procedure.The OIG recommended that the Dallas medical center director, with the Health Administration Service chief, develop local policy and standard operating procedures to ensure invoices are adequately reviewed before payment is made. The OIG also recommended that the Health Administration Service chief recover approximately $3.7 million in overpayments.
One of the Postal Service’s key initiatives of its Delivering for America 10-year plan is to revitalize nearly 19,000 delivery units by targeting markets where it can aggregate delivery units into fewer, larger, centrally located sorting and delivery centers (S&DC). According to the Postal Service, S&DCs will have package sortation equipment, standardize operations, and reduce mail handling costs. The first S&DC was opened in November 2022, and a total of 29 were implemented by the end of September 2023.
We Looked At The Department of Transportation (DOT) reported $12.9 billion in general Property, Plant, and Equipment (PP&E) in its fiscal year 2022 Agency Financial Report (AFR), including $4.2 billion in capitalized equipment. Federal agencies are required to prepare accurate annual financial statements that adhere to accounting principles, as well as to establish internal controls to reduce risk and promote efficient use of property. This requirement exists to provide reliable, accurate descriptions of an agency’s financial position, which includes property. Given DOT’s significant investment in capitalized equipment and the importance of its management, we initiated this audit to assess DOT’s internal controls for managing capitalized equipment, specifically (1) policies for managing capitalized equipment; (2) oversight controls; and (3) guidance regarding capitalization thresholds. What We Found DOT’s policies and procedures for managing capitalized equipment are out-of-date and noncompliant with Federal law. For example, DOT Orders about managing capitalized equipment are dated as far back as 1992, and do not require Operating Administrations to conduct inventories in accordance with the Federal Personal Property Management Act of 2018. In addition, several Operating Administrations’ policies and procedures do not comply with these laws. The Department also lacks proper oversight controls, including an adequate reconciliation process, to ensure that Operating Administrations are maintaining accurate inventories of their equipment. This resulted in the Maritime Administration failing to correct misclassifications of nearly 70 percent of the Department’s total net value of capitalized equipment for fiscal year 2022. Further, we estimated that FRA did not capitalize up to $53 million of eligible equipment. Lastly, DOT also lacks clear guidance on deviating from standard capitalization thresholds, limiting its ability to establish effective internal controls for capitalized asset management. Our Recommendations We made seven recommendations to improve DOT’s internal controls to effectively manage capitalized equipment.