An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Denali Commission
September 2017 Denali Commission Office of Inspector General Semiannual Report to Congress
This Office of Inspector General’s semiannual report summarizes our activities and accomplishments for the period April 1, 2017, through September 30, 2017. During this period, the OIG issued one final audit/evaluation report, completed one investigation, published one Management Advisory and received 302 hotline inquiries, of which 117 were charge processing issues, 82 were complaints related to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964,as amended, and 93 were other investigative allegations.
Each year, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) prepares a summary of the most significant management challenges facing the United States Capitol Police (USCP or the Department). The challenges reflect continuing vulnerabilities OIG identified over the last several years as well as new and emerging issues the Department will face in the coming year.
We determined that FEMA did not manage disaster relief grants and funds adequately and did not hold grant recipients accountable for properly managing disaster relief funds. We identified persistent problems such as improper contract costs and ineligible and unsupported expenditures as examples of this continued failure. During FY 2016, we identified $155.6 million, or 23 percent, in questioned costs out of the $686 million that we audited, which we recommended FEMA disallow as ineligible and unsupported costs. Further, FEMA still does not hold grant recipients accountable for failing to provide adequate monitoring or technical assistance to subgrantees.