An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
Amtrak (National Railroad Passenger Corporation)
Train Operations: The Acela Express 2021 Program Faces Oversight Weaknesses and Schedule Risks
In August 2016, Amtrak (the company) received a federal loan1 to purchase 28 new high-speed trainsets for $1.6 billion and undertake 10 infrastructure improvements needed to operate and maintain these trains for $850 million. Collectively, these projects—called the Acela Express 2021 program—represent the company's largest single investment in its 46 years of service. The new equipment will replace the 20 Acela trainsets currently providing high-speed service on the Northeast Corridor, allowing the company to increase service frequency between Washington, D.C., and Boston, Massachusetts.
The auditors determined that NEA substantially complied with the DATA Act for FY 2017 Q2. Quarter 2 data was submitted timely with over 95 percent of its data submitted accurately, completely, and in accordance with government-wide data standards. However, we noted six procurement awards included in File C that were not listed in File D1. These transactions were erroneously included in File C due to timing issues and a misunderstanding about what types of transactions should be included. These six files represent 2.3% of the sample tested.We recommend that NEA enforce the validations required by the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) to ensure all obligations in File C correspond to the award data in File D1. Moreover, NEA should update their DATA Act SOP to reflect the type of awards that should be excluded and/or included from DATA Act reporting.
We have audited the accompanying Balance Sheet of the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA)as of September 30, 2017 and 2016 and the related Statements of Net Cost, Changes in NetPosition, and Budgetary Resources for the years then ended, and the related notes to thefinancial statements.In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the National Endowment for the Arts as of September 30, 2017 and 2016, and its net cost, changes in net position, and budgetary resources for the years then ended, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.Although not considered to be material weaknesses or significant deficiencies, we noted certain other matters that were communicated to management in a separate letter. Additionally, we have provided the status of the prior year findings in Appendix I.
In our fiscal year 2017 audit, we did not identify any deficiencies in internal control over financialreporting that we consider to be material weaknesses. We noted three matters in FY 2017 thatare discussed in Appendix I and one matter from our FY 2016 audit that remains open.Additionally, we have provided the status of the prior year management letter comments inAppendix I.
Review of Alleged Use of Inappropriate Wait Lists for Group Therapy and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Clinic Team, Eastern Colorado Health Care System
In September 2016, a complainant and letters from several Senators and Representatives alleged the Eastern Colorado Health Care System (ECHCS) used unofficial wait lists for group therapies. Also alleged was that the Colorado Springs Community Based Outpatient Clinic did not take timely action on Post Traumatic Stress Disorder Clinic Team (PCT) consults and falsified medical documentation following a veteran’s suicide. We substantiated ECHCS staff improperly used unofficial wait lists for group therapies. This occurred because management misinterpreted national guidance. As a result, management did not have access to accurate wait times and lacked assurance that staff scheduled all requests. We substantiated PCT staff did not timely process consults. In fiscal year 2016, staff did not initiate scheduling within VHA’s goal of 7 days for an estimated 38 percent of consults or provide care within VHA’s goal of 30 days for an estimated 64 percent of consults. We determined PCT staff inaccurately recorded dates for calculating wait times for an estimated 91 percent of consults that resulted in care, and improperly closed an estimated 40 consults without adequate documentation of scheduling efforts. These conditions occurred for a variety of reasons, including that PCT staff didn’t prioritize consult processing, have sufficient staffing resources, properly record dates, or always record scheduling attempts as required. As a result, veterans experienced underreported delays by an estimated 50 days for initial treatment, and management did not have assurance that staff attempted to schedule all veterans. For an estimated 210 consults, veterans were inappropriately denied the Veterans Choice Program. We did not substantiate Colorado Springs PCT staff falsified medical records. We reviewed medical documentation, interviewed the complainant, and ensured that the Office of Healthcare Inspections reviewed the records. We recommended the ECHCS Director ensure staffing resources are sufficient and staff follow policy when scheduling. The ECHCS Director concurred with all recommendations and provided corrective actions. We closed two recommendations and will monitor remaining corrective actions.
The Consolidated Reports Act of 2000 and Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-136, Financial Reporting Requirements, require that the Office of Inspector General provide the agency head with a summary of the top management and performance challenges facing the agency. It is our assessment that the areas of financial management, human capital, information technology, administrative services, and awardee accountability represent the top management and performance challenges for the National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). Following is a discussion of each challenge area.