An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
U.S. Agency for International Development
Fund Accountability Statement Audit of Milieukontakt Macedonia Skopje, Municipal Climate Change Strategies Project in Macedonia, Award AID 165 A 12-00008, for the Year Ended December 31, 2015
Fund Accountability Statement Audit of USAID Resources Managed by Assist Impact Albania, Building Human and Institutional Capacity Project in Albania, Agreement AID-182-A-12-00001, for the Year Ended December 31, 2015
Agency-Contracted Audit of USAID Resources Managed by Common Market for Eastern and Southern Africa in Multiple Countries Under the Integrated Partnership Assistance Agreement 623-AA-09-001-00-EA, January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2015
Audit of Locally Incurred Costs of USAID Resources Managed by Project for Appropriate Technology in Health in Kenya Under Cooperative Agreement AID-623-A-11-00002, January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2016
Agency-Contracted Agreed Upon-Procedures Report on USAID Resources Managed by Development Aid From People to People in Zambia Under Cooperative Agreement 611-A-00-09-00001-00, March 11, 2009, to September 10, 2013
Audit of USAID Resources Managed by Women and Law in Southern Africa Research and Educational Trust in Zambia Under Agreement AID-611-A-13-00002, January 1, 2016, to December 31, 2016
Audit of USAID Resources Managed by KPMG East Africa Limited Under the Global Resilience Partnership Agreement AID-OAA-A-14-00022, October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2016
Our audit objectives were (1) to assess opportunities for the Mechanical department to reduce costs by right-sizing its component workforce, and (2) to identify potential cost-savings associated with opening its component rebuild workload to competition. Our work indicated that two of three maintenance facilities have excess component rebuild employees and that the company has not fully considered the extent to which it could achieve additional savings by competitively bidding some of its in-house component rebuild workload. As a result, we recommended the company align the maintenance facility’s component workforce with their current and projected workloads. We also recommended that the company assess the cost-effectiveness of continuing to perform any of the component rebuild work in-house, and determine which types of components, if any, should be competitively bid as part of the ongoing company effort to achieve greater maintenance facility efficiencies.