An official website of the United States government
Here's how you know
Official websites use .gov
A .gov website belongs to an official government organization in the United States.
Secure .gov websites use HTTPS
A lock (
) or https:// means you’ve safely connected to the .gov website. Share sensitive information only on official, secure websites.
Brought to you by the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency
Federal Reports
Report Date
Agency Reviewed / Investigated
Report Title
Type
Location
National Labor Relations Board
Fiscal Year 2018 Federal Information Security Moderation Act
The OIG investigated SRC Energy’s self-reported disclosure that it drilled wells through a railroad right-of-way without obtaining a Federal lease or permit to drill. SRC, an oil and gas company based in Colorado, reported its activities to the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), which referred the matter to our office for investigation.We determined that in 2014, SRC committed mineral trespass violations when it knowingly drilled two horizontal wells in Colorado and produced Federal minerals without a properly executed mineral lease, resulting in a loss of public revenue. On April 2, 2019, SRC signed a settlement agreement with the U.S. Department of Justice, agreeing to pay $723,236 to resolve the mineral trespass allegations.
Closeout Audit of Costs Incurred by IDS - International Government Services LLC, Under the Monitoring Support Project in Afghanistan, South & West Provinces TO 2, Contract AID-306-TO-15-00070, August 9, 2015, to August 10, 2017
Financial Audit of Costs Incurred by Family Health International - 360, Under Global Health Supply Chain-Quality Assurance Program in Afghanistan, Contract AID-OAA-C-15-00001, January 2, 2015, to September 30, 2017
Closeout Audit of Costs Incurred by Volunteers for Economic Growth Alliance, Under the Assistance in Building Afghanistan by Developing Enterprises Program in Afghanistan, Cooperative Agreement AID-306-LA-13-00001, January 1, 2016, to July 15, 2018
Financial Audit of Costs Incurred by The Asia Foundation, Under the Survey of the Afghanistan People Program in Afghanistan, Grant Number AID-306-G-12-00003, October 1, 2015, to April 30, 2018
Financial Audit of MCC Resources Managed by the Millennium Development Authority of the Republic of Ghana Under the Grant and Implementation Agreement Between MCC and the Republic of Ghana, August 14, 2013 to September 30, 2016
We reviewed the Northlake Homeless Coalition’s Continuum of Care Program (CoC) based on a hotline complaint alleging impropriety in Northlake’s selection of grant award recipients and as part of our annual audit plan. The objective of our review was to determine whether Northlake administered its CoC in accordance with the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development’s (HUD) and its own program requirements.The hotline complaint did not have merit. However, Northlake did not always administer its CoC in accordance with HUD’s and its own requirements, as it did not always (1) monitor its program partners, (2) maintain adequate supporting documentation for disbursements, and (3) follow procurement requirements. In addition, Northlake did not always ensure that its board members (1) executed code-of-conduct and conflict-of-interest forms, (2) met monthly, (3) maintained written documentation of board meetings, and (4) updated its charters annually. This condition occurred because Northlake was not fully aware of requirements and lacked adequate policies and procedures and staff. As a result, Northlake could not provide reasonable assurance to HUD that its program met its purpose or that it followed HUD’s and other requirements, putting more than $2 million in CoC funds allocated to its program partners at risk of mismanagement. In addition, Northlake paid more than $120,000 in questioned costs. We recommend that the Director of HUD’s New Orleans, LA, Office of Community Planning and Development require Northlake to (1) develop and implement written procedures and take actions to ensure that its program partners better spend more than $2 million, (2) support or repay $128,692, (3) annually monitor its CoC recipients as required, and (4) develop and implement procedures to ensure that its CoC is administered in accordance with HUD’s and its own requirements.